Thread regarding DXC Technology layoffs

WFM UKI

Despite operating at a profit this company has just culled 340 people in UK&I. 50 of those people were graduates on the HPE graduate scheme. Combined salary: £1.25M. Next to nothing in the grand scheme of things. While I don't have the figures these graduates are part bankrolled by the Scottish Government - who pay HPE. Makes this even more mind boggling.

As far as the actual graduate scheme goes... they complain about lack of budget and insist they can't afford training (e.g actually develop the graduates ala development scheme), but managed to find money to hire 13 new graduates in January - who were instantly put into a redundancy pool, though of course they all weren't let go despite being the most undertrained staff in the company, because that would be poor PR for the graduate 'development' scheme.

Now that WFM is largely over we will likely hire many more graduates instead of developing the existing ones. We will end up once again overstaffed but undertrained. Competent staff will be either swarmed or will simply leave. Some months will pass and folk will acclimatise to their environment and get to grips with their project just in time for the next WFM to start, where the cycle begins again. We will continue to haemorrhage money on expensive contractors in order to get projects through the door on time.

Addendum: 10+ graduates were hired for February as well, who happily accepted jobs in the amazing multinational company. They worked their notices, quit their old jobs, and some even moved home to get started - and then they were told they could not start 5 days before their starting date. They are now left unemployed with nothing to show for it.

  • INVENTORY 2938482
by
| 2999 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Mbn2coI

5 replies (most recent on top)

I strongly refute your viewpoint Abc123.

I was a graduate on the HPE grad scheme for almost 3 years and constantly heard senior staff moaning about graduates taking their jobs. The roles I had I worked extremely hard on, even though I was thrown into positions that were far too advanced for my experience level. The truth is that the graduates are used as a bridging gap between making experienced staff redundant and offshoring that role.

In the end I was made redundant as well like many others.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6czk+Mbn2coI

To the OP

The 340 was ITO's body count alone. Total cull is just short of 800 across all business units.

●Inventory 80023765

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4lwy+Mbn2coI

It's a sad truth but the ones that are staying have a bleaker future than those being dismissed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4zex+Mbn2coI

Easy to blame the graduates but without effective leadership or training they will always flounder.

Every "good" one I've encountered has resigned so far citing lack of real training, pressure to do jobs previously occupied by experienced people and a general feeling of being exploited (the true meaning of the word, leveraged)

Shocking way to treat people regardless of any of this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mxz+Mbn2coI

Would not have much sympathy for graduates. The last few years of graduates recruitment has just been terrible. Granted there are some smart ones but due to bad management many of them have been allowed to effectively do nothing and seem fine with coasting along with zero contribution. They look with distain at those of us who work hard and contribute.

Hoping that in the new company there is a shake up and ship out of spoofer managers and many recent grads/post grads who are not willing to put the effort in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ubk+Mbn2coI

Post a reply

: