Thread regarding Seagate Technology Inc. layoffs

Did Seagate going private in 20 billion dollar deal involving Veritas & SilverLake Partners hurt the long term future?

The 2000 20-billion dollar deal looked like a great deal for Seagate then hurt the long term viability of the company by divesting interests in companies that Seagate had stake on? YOU BE THE JUDGE.

"I think the value the shareholders are getting is pretty spectacular" -Steve Luczo

There were tradeoffs, one one them is giving up interest in SanDisk. I don't think the SMT saw SanDisk as part of a long term strategic vision then.

Seagate to go private in $20 billion deal

Seagate Technology wants to go private.

Sergio G.Non

By Sergio G.Non | March 30, 2000 -- 08:30 GMT (00:30 PST) | Topic: Tech Industry

Recommended Content:

White Papers: Stay ahead of the pace! Keep your network up and data secure

Find out how hybrid connectivity solutions help you stay ahead of the pace of change by keeping your network up and data secure. Evolve your network as your business digitally transforms. Level 3 offers solutions by helping enable your journey...

Download Now

0

Under the terms of a $20 billion agreement unveiled after market close Thursday, the storage technology company would sell its 33 percent stake of Veritas Software back to Veritas while a private investment group led by Silver Lake Partners would buy Seagate's operations for cash.

The parties valued the deal at $20 billion, or roughly $77.50 per Seagate share, a 26 percent premium to Seagate's average price over the last 30 days.

That calculation includes $5 from the Silver Lake group and 0.467 Veritas shares, worth about $72.50 for every Seagate share, as of Wednesday's close. It also assumes Veritas will keep about $500 million cash, although it has the right to up to $750 million in retained cash.

Thursday's deal requires Silver Lake's group to pay about $2 billion cash for Seagate's core operations.

Veritas will issue a total of about 116 million shares to recover 128 million shares from Seagate as well as the aforementioned cash and Seagate's holdings of Gadzoox Networks, SanDisk, CVC and Dragon Systems, which was acquired by Lernout GS Capital, a Goldman Sachs unit; August Capital; Texas Pacific Group; Integral Capital; and Chase Capital Partners.

After stagnating for much of last year, shares of Seagate have risen recently along with disk drive stocks in general. The stock rose as high as 74 in after-hours activity. It closed Wednesday's regular trading at 62 15/16."

http://www.zdnet.com/article/seagate-to-go-private-in-20-billion-deal/

by
| 1998 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+OAIMspA

5 replies (most recent on top)

I doubt the percentage of ESPP shares amounts to anything that would have shareholder clout.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3gpw+OAIMspA

All the employees with their ESPP and Vest Stock should group together with an activist shareholder and put pressure on the board.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vcl+OAIMspA

I remember watching the footage of steve smirking and saying how much of a mistake WD made by buying Sandisk,how it cost too much and how they'd regret it and all seagate had to do was bide their time and pounce at the right moment.Still waiting on seagate to pounce and im betting it will be a long long wait.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qar+OAIMspA

Financial engineering screwed this company - and Luczo is the main culprit ... always short term result instead of long term value.

Still remember when WD bought Sandisk - STX mgmt talked about the cost of the money. Look today where WD is and where STX is. One is flourishing and another sliding down the hill to extinction ...

Pray that another fools buy this company this time around ...

Wonder what the BOD does - beside en-cashing the $0 options - do they really do any oversight - why there is no investor action - specially the institutional one ... go & get scam master into the court !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ids+OAIMspA

Short term financial engineering using the company as a "vehicle to unlock value" to enrich a few at the expense of long term thinking.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rce+OAIMspA

Post a reply

: