Thread regarding Kellogg layoffs

Kellogg's cannot run a sales organization thru reports behind a desk!

I could be wrong about 2nd qtr numbers but that is what understood from K's presser. And from a Mgr. Let's be realistic here, Eanie-Day does not want the huge costs associated with a DSD sales force. That's fine but along with that action will be a reaction: reduced sales.

If Kelloggs leadership thinks sales will now increase without DSD controlling the sales, orders, inventory and merchandising on almost a daily basis in a store then K leadership truly have NO idea what is going on at store level. Call the termination of DSD for what it is: a salary dump purely motivated by P&L pressures.

To say this is motivated by online purchasing trends is ludicrous. I live outside a major metropolitan city and I don't see the online Grocer delivery trucks clogging the roads nor do I see many of the store online employee shoppers.

DSD was the easiest target to attack and had NO advocates or champions to save it. We all know the account teams coukd -hit the bed and still keep their jobs (Acme). But now the account teams are the low hanging fruit and if sales slip significantly, they along with new snak reps will be hit next. Then starts the death spiral.

Once again, you can't run a sales organization thru reports behind a desk.

by
| 2073 views | | 3 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+OVKKjvD

3 replies (most recent on top)

Incompetent morons with a flawed business plan when they were in DSD and replaced with another plan is a catastrophic failure. Everything this company touches turns to crap. I called the company's failure 5 years ago when they turned away from sales and went down the cost save plan.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4hri+OVKKjvD

Kelloggs is right back to where they were in 2001,no control over their product,and no one out there pushing it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ddl+OVKKjvD

Amen. The spiral began when we (reps) were let go. Its only going to get worse from here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wsw+OVKKjvD

Post a reply

: