Thread regarding Oracle Corp. layoffs

Now that the end is near for Sun

From an enterprise perspective, here are the core issues with Sun...

1) A failure to execute. They were increasingly unable to compete in the high-end UNIX server market against IBM. The Rock processor was constantly delayed. Their machines fell behind in performance, Solaris was harder to manage and less stable than AIX.

2) Inability to capitalize on their inventions. IBM used Java as a common language across all of their enterprise platforms, they sold Websphere as a common application platform. NetApp was able to build a large business off NFS.

3) Linux/Intel got a lot better on the low end, Sun could not give a good reason why their platform was worth the additional cost. Usually when you are disrupted on the low end, you move upmarket, but due to 1) they were unable to take this path.

4) Muddled strategy: they dabbled in a lot of things-storage, office suites, mysql, etc. It was hard to tell if they loved or hated open source at times. They spent years battling Microsoft in the press. They had 2-3 different virtualization technologies. Some of the best Fake Steve Jobs posts are when he ripped into Sun.

5) Even if they were able to execute, their niche was becoming less viable. A mid-tier hardware manufacturer using a proprietary operating system is not a good position to be in. They did not have the deep enterprise roots and consulting business that IBM has, nor a massive install base like Linux or Windows.

by
| 2075 views | | 3 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+P20KC5R

3 replies (most recent on top)

Seriously dude, is this really a good time to do a post mortum or case study?

sheeshh....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qts+P20KC5R

Sun.. yes, StorageTek, an acquisition, subsequently an Oracle entity. Anyone remember Pat Martin? Hired for the sale of STK, after Dave Weiss had little option than to resign. STK had the corner of the market when it came of tape solutions. They were better, faster, and more reliant than IBM's offerings. Yet later to market, but customers wanted the tape libraries, the transports, and the unconditional support. what on earth did Sun MICROsystems want with big iron peripheral tape/disk solutions? They didn't. Pony tail boy wanted a customer base. McNeely handed the reins to Schwartz. Like Martin, Schwartz walked away with more money than either of them could spend in a lifetime. All, behind a swath of the jobless and talented engineers. Those that designed and supported, the products. For what? CEO's garnering the effort? A reverse split of the stock? The names have changed, but the game remains the same. Sadly, it's Corporate America...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tuj+P20KC5R

OP - you are about 70% off here. You may want to educate yourself a bit...

Check out this 50+ response thread that we had this week - that'd a perfect start in your quest for truth and knowledge:

  • Why Sun Failed? @OWQEY7M or www.thelayoff.com/t/OWQEY7M
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lus+P20KC5R

Post a reply

: