Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

How to fix Intel

Intel was good company and there are still some good employees, although fewer and fewer.

The higher on the pyramid the more clown like it is.

Vicious cycle, where clown hires alike, is one of the roots of Intel deterioration.

Other root is that demons of broken values roam and spread like disease.

Third root as engineering standards deterioration lays in what some call power points and engineering detached or vision reality detached smoke and mirror primarily driven by clowns self interests milking what is left of Intel's monopoly cadaver. High level technical employees are progressively reality attached as their skills are smoke and mirror. Management chain is even worse measured by their required mix of expertise or rather heavy lack of. By internal numbers less than 1 in 10 PE's has any hands on skills, while in other small-mid-big high tech companies this ration is reverse 9 in 10 or more. Often employee with hands on skills is increasingly looked unfavorably and pushed to convert to bad culture and deteriorated standards to produce same smoke and mirror power points.

Fourth is heavily political HR that constantly fails to address things in correct way.

There is nobody to from above, like former founders, to see this and clean it.

Other companies can be found to have similar problems although not at this level and mix, except likes CISCO and Linkedin to which nobody wants to look up to.

Suggestions and corrections to this picture welcome.

Sante!

by
| 1880 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+PCpjLJV

10 replies (most recent on top)

Fix is possible but hard. We have to fix the BoD and CEO first

-- BOD needs to be more active. The BOD for the most part have academic, VC or government experience. We need a lot more business executives who have experience with turnarounds. Bryan has too much influence

-- BK is a well intentioned executive and i like him but has many gaps

  • NO product/technology experience,

  • NO P&L experience, before he became the CEO,

  • NO charisma

  • NO motivational, communication skills

  • NO RESPECT from customers, partners and employees

  • NO development of leaders

Hire a charismatic young leader with significant turnaround experience

Once this is done, other fixes will follow. But no hope, until the leadership is fixed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6hvk+PCpjLJV

It's already too late and no way to fix it. Intel has become clown town, the clowns roam free and rule the day.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6kpa+PCpjLJV

The new Oracle’s wisdom is clear and accurately, doesn’t the Zebra change its strips. Intel and the ingrained force within is immovable with current management and they have the large country cultural thing do face, Samsung and other Far Easter not so much

“For a big company like Intel, the essence of its corporate culture can hardly be changed; but this is not the case with Samsung, which can easily make changes in this aspect, given strong cohesiveness among all its workforce, according to Chang.”

http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20171011PD201.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5kjk+PCpjLJV

Intel is already a company of the past.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5qxq+PCpjLJV

No fix possible for now. Many of best colleagues and best employees have left already.

I am in the process to leave soon and agree with "@PCpjLJV-3hlc" that with current complete leadership chances are low like on lottery. If you add worsening environment Intel is not the place to be anymore.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4mxw+PCpjLJV

Sadly when they picked BK over the number three choice the fate of the company for the next decade was assured. Without an outsider very little chance to get the cultural and strategic change required. BK has neither the intelligence nor track record to get inte to make the right hand turn. Sad for those that stayed or have few options to leave, I count myself lucky to have moved to a second and fun new opportunity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3hlc+PCpjLJV

OP and "@PCpjLJV-2txg" are among many that I know personally that can confirm the same. Common theme all agreeing that this kind of change can not come from within but from top down from above to within. Deterioration in leadership makes me very sad as I love this company through number of great individual people of all colors of its employees across the continents and am even more sad when, due to the lack of addressing the problems, we all see extremist posts here poking with pokes back where the immediate victim is constructive dialogue and anyone with the flag of objectivity would be shoot from both poking and poke back side. Ultimately, such prolonged state drags whole company down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3jup+PCpjLJV

I've been with Intel > 15 years and can comment. My perception is the same as yours specifically in three areas:

  1. Some good employees still remain at Intel, although it's getting to be fewer and fewer

  2. Intel used to have strong core values but those have become broken (and I would add seem to be continuing to deteriorate)

  3. Intel's HR department is heavily political HR and constantly fails to address situations appropriately (which in turn impacts 1 & 2 above)

Not sure how to fix it as with a company of this size and scale it will take years and drastic leadership changes in order to monumentally move the culture, recover and address the above. A simple thing of getting Intel back to it's core basic fundamental values would be a start. But that would require a significant shift and action plan across Intel's leaders and Intel's HR organization. This shift in order to fix would not be a small endeavor considering the degradation in core values and erosion of trust/transparency that has occurred over the last two years and seems to be continuing to occur.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2txg+PCpjLJV

Intel's leadership development is the biggest problem.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2cua+PCpjLJV

@PCpjLJV-syy your post speaks volumes (about denial, destructive character, opportunistic milking)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nbj+PCpjLJV

Post a reply

: