Below poster, I read your post and my post is just related to the thread and what I heard about the amount of overall layoffs, not quite understanding why you felt my post was a comment on yours?
36 replies (most recent on top)
Below poster, I am the one who said 5 hcm. If you'll read my post though you'll see I had 5 under my COM and that I am unsure of entire numbers. I never said only 5 overall.
I heard a total of 650 overall.
No one knows the exact numbers but there were definitely more than 5 HCM RNs that were let go, A previous post mentioned 5.
2 new hire HCM RN on my team and several more that I know of, another HCM that was here 7 years, 2 coverage team coaches here 7-9 years and a COM
Last poster is that nurse bilingual? From what I've heard that was the only exception for new hire nurses
There is 1 new nurse on my team that has been here less than 3 months that was NOT laid off.
PHC’s are going to have to reteam after many teams were decimated.
I don't believe HCM was the most impacted. we were told only 5 HCM under my COM were impacted. We weren't told complete numbers however. Based on posts, lools like PHC was the hardest hit again.
NAO= new associate orientation. It's Just a term they give large groups of case managers who start together. I'm appalled at the responses to the person giving the information about how people were choosen. This is why when people have inside information they don't speak up on here. They are attacked and insulted.
I have seen the term NAO used. As in 'my entire NAO group'. What is NAO?
4 SS coaches and 40+ HCMSSs
I know coaches who have confirmed they had to complete assessments/rankings of associates earlier this year. Maybe your coach has said this is not the case, but it is unlikely s/he would not have done this...or they are lying to you. Im sure quality scores, company involvement and salaries were also figured into things, but these assessments/rankings played a key role.
@Q3D9rv9-1usz I was on that meeting today. When asked how people were chosen for layoff DK from HR stated that a Humana HR approved system which INCLUDED ASSESSMENT was used. The coach absolutely was part of that assessment. This was true for the CHE, PHC and HCM-SS roles.
FCM RN 3 years let go. Associate, not Network.
Who is they?
Sorry 1yqs but thats what they said
New hire HCM, and I can confirm that what the poster who said it was new hire HCM said is true. I spoke with several nurses I started with and my entire NAO group was impacted. I spoke with my coach privately today and she also told me that the last few groups of us were hired based on an assumption that didn't come true. If other HCM were included, I don't know how they were chosen or how many. I just know that all of the people i onboarded with have been impacted. What makes me more angry than anything is why they would have hired us in the first place. They had to know that they didn't intend to keep us. I left a good position to come here, because I thought the hours were perfect. Who doesn't want to work from home? Now I'm going to be stuck working a nightshift position in the hospital probably. I feel lied to and deceived.
Sorry PHC, but I sincerely doubt anyone in leadership told you there was no funding for the program and no referrals. Even if that is fact, leadership has the talking points that the program will be smaller in 2018and membership reduced in order to rebuild and strengthen. I'm sure that is a lie, though I have worked for 2 large companies who have done this. But I'm not sure who would have come out and said their is no funding.
Phc here told no funding for program no members are being referred and i have been here 4 years coworkers impacted also have been here 4 yrs or more not just new hires
. When SW calls her meeting possibly later this week to address the lay off, she will speak to that. Your coach should also have been given talking points today to pass down to you also highlighting this and tell you that it was based on poor enrolment projections for 2018.
This does not mean that layoffs were done on leader assessment, as you stated. Poor enrollment projections has nothing to do with leader assessment. Our team had our meeting, so our coach didn't 'speak' to the assessments that they did to lay off our teammates. Because it is flat out untrue
And other CMs were laid off, not just the new ones, and those weren't based on tenure.
I have my facts 100% correct, thank you very much. All HCMs hired in since august were laid off. When SW calls her meeting possibly later this week to address the lay off, she will speak to that. Your coach should also have been given talking points today to pass down to you also highlighting this and tell you that it was based on poor enrolment projections for 2018. As for other disciplines, I can only tell what I have heard second hand and that is they were not choosen by the same method nurses were. HCM coaches were kept in the dark the entire time. They heard the rumors the same as everyone else did, but were not given answers from COMs at all. Trust me...they all asked for reassurances from their COMs and were given non answers.
Oh great, another thread turning into hcmss bashing. Another thread by a coach specifically said they had no input on the people laid off. Humana has said the people selected were done by an outside consulting firm, the hcmss on my team impacted would NOT have been by coach assessment. How rude to even suggest that anyone laid off was by a coach's assessment...and that great rumor that went around about that a few months ago was debunked, it wasn't assessments, it was the annual Evans being done. I am so blown away you would suggest that all layoffs other than the nurses was due to the coach's assessment and the CMS were just based on tenure. That is blatant misinformation and a really sh--ty thing to even suggest to those that were impacted today. Really?'!?!?
A bunch of PHC’s.
And, I don't think it was 40 hcmss, where did you get that number from, we were told it was less than that. The CMS took a bigger hit than other areas
I know CMs that were laid off that were not last hire, and they weren't chosen on tenure, you may want to check your facts
So 40 hcmss were let go based on coaches assessment?!?!! I call b.s.
40 confirmed SS’s today. maybe more.
HCMs were chosen strictly on tenure. Anyone hired since august was let go. However, that was the only "last in first out" group. All other disciplines were done based on leader assessment.
Does not seem to be a rhyme or reason on location, tenure, or performance. Don’t think today was the end.
NAO?
My whole group of NAO HCMRN'S were let go. About 17 of us I think.
In Virginia, my CCL manager was let go. We are all at a loss for words.
It seems at least 15 hcmss were let go
PA HCM-RN let go today.
I also wonder where people cut are located...what state