Thread regarding State Farm Insurance layoffs

What in the world happened?

I read some of these posts and especially some of the replies and wonder what exactly has happened. When did people who have no empathy or sympathy for others become a viable SF employee. SF used to be an employer of choice. Now they (and by they, I mean we) bring in people that have no compassion in an industry that must have it. Hire people that have no empathy or sympathy for others, into a company that was once famed for exactly that.

Like others have said, it used to be difficult to get on with SF. Now our turnover is so high that if you have a pulse and a clean record, you'll get a job. Of course they'll only stay long enough to become trained then out the door to a competitor, but hey, that's why we have trainers, right? To train people for our competitors?

When will our executives realize that not only is SF no longer an insurance provider of choice, we aren't even an employer of choice any longer. When will they realize that the opinions voiced on sites like this one will have an influence on where a recent college graduate will apply, much less accept an offer? Do we want to spend the next 10 years training employees for other companies or perhaps, we should consider keeping those we want, not just those who have no place else to go?

We have people in the same boat I am. Those who, due to age, are locked in and while we can go elsewhere, we choose not to because we are too close to receiving our pension. What's going to happen in 10-15 years when all those who are in a similar position retire?

by
| 2372 views | | 3 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+TQtoFVv

3 replies (most recent on top)

Systems executives who never programmed? Sounds similar to the experience level of Auto executives who can pump gas or Fire executives who can hang a picture. This is the root of the problem: office-bubbles.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mck+TQtoFVv

I agree with the op except with the comments about "training". For the last few years in systems (et), company sponsored training had been scarce. One to two decades ago we were the envy of the industry in technical training - today not even close. I attribute it to selection of leadership who weren't technical themselves. Just think about those et executives today and count how many ever programmed themselves...(less than 50%)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @omi+TQtoFVv

Because the company is now run by narcissistic psychological manipulators who only care about empirical evidence of their power. There was a time when SF was the primary employer in Bloomville and there was no Hawthorne Hills, lies and deception within the ranks, overt pretty people, or rampant infidelity exhibited by the higher-ups. This was a time when we employed the best minds in the insurance industry. I know it is hard to take, but trust no one, watch everything you say or do, do not suggest change of any kind, or criticize any directive. It will in no way benefit you. Just provide unconditional narcissistic supply and wait out your time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zbz+TQtoFVv

Post a reply

: