Thread regarding Oracle Corp. layoffs

1 yr stock performance comparison

Oracle -1%

MSFT +48%

SFDC +61%

AMZN +97%

What are LE, MH, and SC getting paid for exactly? Maybe the BoD could explain

by
| 1326 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+UIjokBD

6 replies (most recent on top)

Oracle CEOs are also paid a lot more than those other companies. They deliver less value and only serve to enrich themselves. That’s not the type of company I would want to be investing in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wdx+UIjokBD

Hey LE - how come your company is the worst performing tech company out there? Maybe you and your fellow stooges are not as smart as you think and definitely not worth the money you’re all costing the shareholders? Time to retire LE and hand over the reigns to somebody COMPETENT. Yes, a new word for you, look it up in a dictionary LE!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jff+UIjokBD

One other point on AMZN that makes the Oracle comparison seem even worse is that AWS revenues are only a little more than 10% of the overall revenues for AMZN. Can you imagine with Oracle stock performance would be like if it had a huge lower margin retail business?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fah+UIjokBD

@UIjokBD-1wap

What does being employed or not employed at a company have to do with the price of Fish? Don't stock analysts make such comparisons every day? Does stating simple facts bother you this much? It is a perfectly legitimate comparison.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wxn+UIjokBD

What makes you think that i’m not?!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ntj+UIjokBD

And that’s after tens of billions of dollars in share buybacks, imagine what the share price would be without thevbuybacks - like negative 50% return?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xmu+UIjokBD

Post a reply

: