Thread regarding IBM layoffs

The RedHat buy was a bet, but it was the only bet left to play

You say IBM overpaid, And I agree with you. BUT what was the alternative??? IBM had to get back into the game of cloud, and the only way to do that was buy Redhat or Hortenworks. They were the only 2 open source players left standing. (both have since been gobbled up). Remember why IBM had to do this. IBM owned the Enterprise developers market until approx 5 years ago. That’s when Open source took off. IBM refused to show the developers a path from Z, Unix, or OS/400 to “Open” source, and thus left the door open for the developers to switch horses. SO you are a developer and have the choice of supporting 3 code stacks (Z, Unix, and OS/400) or you get the choice to move to one code stack (LINUX). What do you do??? Of course you choose LINUX . IBM refused to invest here, and developers abandoned them at warp speed. IBM has finally thrown in the towel and agreed they should have invested, but that train has left the station. So how do you get back into the cloud game, and possibly into the good graces of the developer community??? Redhat baby. You call the enterprise code game “hybrid”, and assimilate the biggest player. You then leverage that “enterprise” code stack via Redhat to exploit what’s already installed. GAME OVER. Is it a big bet. YES!!!! BUT it’s the only bet left to play Oh by the way Google should have bought Redhat, but while they were proposing a partnership, IBM was getting their checkbook out. Google there was an opportune moment and you let it pass. Overpaying May Be correct, BUT remember IBM’s first offer of 185 was rejected. IBM was determined to crash the cloud party as they knew they were fading away, and the only way to do it was leverage the code. Most Wall Street analysts say there are three major players in cloud. Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. Each has their strength. I believe IBM just out flanked Google, and will most likely leverage their way into 3rd place. Like I said before. ITS a BIG bet, but it was the only bet left to play.

Found this post buried in one of the threads. Felt it should have a thread of its own. OP is @X0i89tz-1hio .

by
| 859 views | | 1 reply (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+X1iS0ku

1 reply

Buying an operating system company to get into the cloud space won't make them into a google, AWS or microsoft. Those companies are successful because they have the software applications and infrastructure that IBM doesn't have. When companies cut costs they IT projects are cut because SaaS doesn't reduce cost by much, given cloud services are not that much cheaper that company hosted in the long run.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3fue+X1iS0ku

Post a reply

: