Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM laying off more than 300 in RTP

https://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article224283465.html#storylink=latest_side

by
| 2229 views | | 11 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+X4DauJI

11 replies (most recent on top)

70% of IBM workers are via remote home office and that number is growing.

The client is what's important here, not your manager.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6aqa+X4DauJI

IBM is old tech company, it keeps the old tech workers, and contractors and remote workers in US and Cannada, for exsample: the Austin designer team. the team members some of in Cannada and some of in U.S work as remotely, The manager did not know what there are workiing on daily, The manager (Si) n The User Accessibllty is new to team in September last year,]. He is a political mamager and he tried to please the team members because most team members have been in the group in decades.

IBM will be destroy with the older IBMer. need to clean house and hire more new young talent worker as others tech companies

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6fsj+X4DauJI

My money is on services.

Bain is putting the lipstick on the pig right now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6nbo+X4DauJI

IBM will need to sell more than Setetus to pay for Red Hat. IBM is looking for $20 Billion... that means at least a full division has to be sold off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4aun+X4DauJI

Seterus 100 pct

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3hza+X4DauJI

Did Ginny get a raise or something?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ume+X4DauJI

I better start looking for my old shine box.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3eee+X4DauJI

I heard IBM is going to start leasing out their vacant space at RTP.

That's what IBM Dubuque has done with several of their floors.

Sign of the times for big blue.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2wtf+X4DauJI

yes Bif, per the article mortgage "services" getting hit hard

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qfx+X4DauJI

This is Seterus only per the article.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ouk+X4DauJI

Services getting hit hard no doubt.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @auh+X4DauJI

Post a reply

: