Thread regarding Walmart layoffs

Jobs are a means to that end

I hate to break it to you but Walmart, nor any other company, is in business to employ people. The business of business is to make money for its shareholders. Period. Jobs are a means to that end. A company will do its best to treat its staff as best as they can because its through the efforts of the staff that a company makes money but competitive pressure is always forcing business to adapt and change. Sometimes that means changes in staffing. Were you upset when WM switched from cashiers having to type in product prices rather than being able to simply scan barcodes? It led to job losses so you should have been. Saying that greed drives staffing is mind numbingly ignorant. Whose greed? The Waltons? Doug? The C-level execs? If Walmart doesn’t remain competitive then no one will have a job here. Would you prefer that?

What’s stated in this post by @XijdUTi-xad is something most of us don’t want to here, but it’s definitely true. This is our reality and in these circumstances, it wouldn't be possible to have it any different.

by
| 1220 views | | 7 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+XjpWSfA

7 replies (most recent on top)

There's a right way to do it. If you are planning on layoffs STOP filling positions up to the minute before laying off a bunch of staff! Leave the open positions alone and THEN when the company decides to chop heads it won't be as many people affected. Just let natural attrition do the work

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3kpe+XjpWSfA

I thought the same wat till their forced ranking system hit and seen hardworking people let go and replaced with 2 college educated people who still couldn’t figure out how to carry out tasks and more concerned about their personal life than focusing on work. They promote the lazy brown noses and let go the true laborers and it’s seen the company can’t figure out now how to keep a simple shelf stocked and Walmart.com always show out of stock on items.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yhw+XjpWSfA

Yep that is certainly a consideration, been considering it for years. We'll see if our DC actually gets a raise this year, after 5 years of basically nothing. Used to be a decent paying job but now is at least a few bucks an hour less than most similar factory/distribution type jobs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ofa+XjpWSfA

Whiners. If you don’t like working for Walmart then quit and find another job. Why sit around and b--ch about it? Take control of your own damn life. No one owes you anything.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hrv+XjpWSfA

Should unionize

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ehw+XjpWSfA

"Whose greed"? Yes all of the above but mostly the Waltons and the board of directors. When you steal accrued sick time from your employees that's not just trying to be competitive. Refusing to give raises is also counterproductive because none of us give a sh-- now, we'll do as little as possible but at least you saved 2% by not giving a cost of living raise. The shop at our DC is a prime example. No real raises for years and then they screw with people till they all quit. All of a sudden they have 12 mechanics and their goal is to have 30! They can't hire because their pay is no longer competitive and word is out about how c-appy Walmart is to work for. So guess what, they all got a $5.50 an hour raise this year because they are in desperation mode and have nobody to fix the trucks. Pretty ignorant the way this company screws people but refuses to see what it's costing them...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ezg+XjpWSfA

This sounds like apologist bs from someone at home office trying to deflect walmart's continuing actions for culling associates. Everyone knows walmart doesn't want to pay or have associates - they are a necessary evil in the pursuit of higher profits for shareholders. In this vein, walmart should get out of the retail business altogether. Unfortunately for walmart people still need to stock shelves at their stores.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qxs+XjpWSfA

Post a reply

: