Thread regarding General Motors layoffs

Compare Notes on Those Targeted vs Those Who Where Not

Trying to see if there was any logic other than target cost ... In our case the first person on the list of cuts was one of the most senior people ... but definitely the one with the highest salary. Then there were some new hires (who probably got the shortest end of the stick losing their unvested 401k matches but-necessary carnage in order to balance off the older employees with targets on their backs). In all the average age of those targeted was around 49 with the average age of those not targeted at 39.

by
| 2418 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+XvGzs0y

10 replies (most recent on top)

Hardest working guy I've ever seen laid off this morning. Not sure of exact age, but over 50.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1llo+XvGzs0y

Wtf. They could at least let us keep the 401k

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qpf+XvGzs0y

I was let go this morning. Not a white male. less than 3 years of service. Lost company match, which was substantial. A common theme in my group seemed to be people who were not long time GMers - either directly or indirectly(HP, EDS etc)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nir+XvGzs0y
  1. Level 8 Non people manager

  2. Work for GM less than 3 years (unvested 401K saved GM a lot of money)

  3. Recently transfer from anther group to here

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pom+XvGzs0y

White, male, over 50 is the biggest pool so by far in our group. Salary does not seem to be a factor. Not many managers yet either. Still going on strong so we should see the whole picture soon.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tfl+XvGzs0y

40+ Years experience in Manufacturing. In IT the past 20 years. VDOC. Several colleagues of 50+ age let go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @unj+XvGzs0y

Seems like salary and age were very big factors, and from my group the only level 5s/6s that were let go were not #1 performers, worked from home often, and never really added any value to the team other than the bare minimum ask.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qoi+XvGzs0y

I agree with salary and age being targeted (older targeted and younger to offset) ... but have heard of Many exceptional performers even in key growth areas getting cut.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ehm+XvGzs0y

The target priority appears to have been location, salary, age, and then performance. I know of several #1 performers that are over 50, yet they were cut. GM doesn't understand technology and virtual collaboration, either.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tog+XvGzs0y

Even if the layoffs were necessary, keeping the 401K matches was not. It was a recruitment tool, in other words a promise of prosperity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cdj+XvGzs0y

Post a reply

: