Thread regarding General Motors layoffs

Layoffs are immoral

Layoffs are immoral. To deprive someone of a wage not because he is failing to earn it or because you can no longer afford to pay it but because you have decided that you would prefer not to pay him is robbery. The fact that it has been a widely accepted and almost universally recommended business practice for more than 30 years tells us one thing: Corporations do not exist to deliver goods and services to people. Nor are they there to provide employment to workers. They are a nihilistic engine for the accumulation of wealth. Just as equine sporting events provide the necessary arithmetic for a numbers racket, so too is the fantasy of the corporation that Does Something an unavoidable component of making it possible for people to profit from an increase in its stock price. These people are playing Pokémon with the nation's wealth.

Originally posted by: @XxR73tt-ekn

Good post.

by
| 1314 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Xx8xZjW

10 replies (most recent on top)

They should have laid me off. I considered myself one of the most unproductive and laziest workers at GM. I'm just here for a check. Hearing everyone stories makes me kinda sympathize with their situation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3xoi+Xx8xZjW

The biggest tragedy here is people arguing for the rights of the corporation, particularly one that is not facing bankruptcy. There used to be some sense of community and the betterment of society and our fellow citizen but that has shifted to focus on short-term gain and greed, no matter what the cost. And now we have hourly workers defending the rights of billionaires. We have adopted a bully mentality and now defend their right to chase excessive bonuses and profit and nothing is off limits. This is the new behavior of the United States and nothing to be proud of. As we falter as a society and impact thousands while thousands more increase the wealth gap, we risk losing our hearts and minds and our position in the world.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2nfc+Xx8xZjW

"It's weird that you use the word "Immoral". Cutting 15% of a workforce so that 100% of the workforce isn't faced with bankruptcy in the near future seems like the "moral" thing to do to me."

One could argue that the initial 15% hired before, were unnecessary, thus saving everyone from the get go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lpk+Xx8xZjW

Maybe Ocasio-Cortez can propose legislation requiring everyone aged 23 and older to buy a Chevy Impala. That will keep people employed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @frz+Xx8xZjW

With all due respect, the OP could really benefit from a basic course in economics and/business.

(I've been laid off, but never thought it was immoral or a form of robbery).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jla+Xx8xZjW

No. You have every right to terminate your working relationship with a company any time just as a company can terminate their working relationship with you. These are rights protected by state law.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nnl+Xx8xZjW

It is just a business relationship. If you like what they offer you as salary and benefits and they like your contribution and can afford to pay you then the relationship will continue. When one side doesn't want the other or both then the relationship is terminated. No hard feeling. But I don't agree with the way they did it. Not telling people ahead of time and walking people out in front of other people are very bad way to treat people. If I will find a better job, I will leave them just because of that.

Good time for the Work Place of choice survey. So ironic and ridiculous.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bnr+Xx8xZjW

Layoffs in general? No. This one, stinks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qjt+Xx8xZjW

It's weird that you use the word "Immoral". Cutting 15% of a workforce so that 100% of the workforce isn't faced with bankruptcy in the near future seems like the "moral" thing to do to me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dkt+Xx8xZjW

Hey, you know I don't like seeing folks laid off and I hope they are able to find something to make a living on rather soon. I also don't like seeing this when a company is at record profits and it's not how I'd run a business. However, I strongly disagree that this should be labeled as 'robbery.' To rob, IMO, would insinuate the company is taking what is rightfully the employees property and a job Is nothing like that. As an employee you are being paid to provide services to the payer (the employer) until your services are no longer needed. They are not obligated to keep you even when they don't need those services.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uuw+Xx8xZjW

Post a reply

: