Thread regarding General Motors layoffs

Electrical production conversion rates, are they practical for Electrical vehicles and our future?

There are several ways to produce electrical energy. The highly efficient ones are not practical to drive an electric vehicle future. Example nuclear, hydro, solar, and wind.

The ones that do produce a majority of our energy have an 18-22% conversion rate on btu:btu exchange.

So if I put 1,000,000 bits of energy in i can get rough 180,000 to 220,000 btu's of energy back in electricity.

North America has the largest oil reserve in the world in the Oil Sands. It makes the Saudi's look meek. There may be over 200 years reserve or more. The conversion rates on petroleum are very high over compared to electrical generation worldwide.

EV is exciting, but wasting oil reserves being a knucklehead Starbucks latte generation dreaming this is the future is foolish.

What do you think is going to happen in the world economy after the President rebuilds the world's strongest military, controls world gd&p, and takes away the Saudi's reign in world market manipulations?

The new CEO of GM will be pushing a race to 70 mpg internal combustion with large torque ratios. Ps I don't think the CEO's name will be Marry, it will most likely be Mark.

Wise words to think about, "Don't take your eye off the ball."

by
| 769 views | | 9 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+YiALnI5

9 replies (most recent on top)

Almost nothing trump says or promises turns out to be true.

I wouldn't count on him to fix anything.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2fin+YiALnI5

Don't Ford and FCA have factories in Mexico, too?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wdb+YiALnI5

BIG OIL + POLITICIANS = NO ELECTRIC FUTURE.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rqk+YiALnI5

Do you mean a subject matter expert - rather than domain expert?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @seg+YiALnI5

All well and good in Alberta where you have access to water, but once transportation, natural gas and refining costs are accounted for, it's no better than corn ethanol. In US oil sands, where you largely have no access to water, and just as importantly, no access to water disposal, the economics are disastrous. You really have no idea as to what you're talking about here, coming up against a domain expert.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qtk+YiALnI5

The oil sands have been worked on since 1940's. The processing of centrifuge extraction could be the best way to harvest.

Previous commentator may want to do more research, and not just Google thoughts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wzw+YiALnI5

Oil sands aren't reserves, it's just an expensive science experiment. All attempts to make them remotely economic have ended in abject failure. If we ever do get around to using them, whether the energy return on energy invested will be positive is highly questionable.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dih+YiALnI5

Yes yes and yes 100 % agreed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xew+YiALnI5

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/03/28/president-trump-gas-prices-oil-opec/3297679002/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cmr+YiALnI5

Post a reply

: