Thread regarding Bank of New York Mellon Corp. layoffs

The only lever they have at the moment is cost cutting/containment

Blockchain is an existential threat, as tiw has stated, to BNYM and any financial services institution that provides custody services.

However, this is a long term threat as blockchain requires a massive amount of distributed computing power and an agreement on what and how things will be stored and transacted on the blockchain by all parties using it.

A blockchain based custody ledger isn’t just going to appear overnight and disrupt the financial industry without the Fed and other sovereign government authorities stepping in to regulate it; this will take years.

BNYM is facing an ugly near term threat in that their revenue pipeline is currently non existent.

There is zero growth in custody banking and the next 3 quarters are going to be bumpy which is why BNYM is laying off so many people.

The only lever they have at the moment is cost cutting/containment.

5 year ago, BNYM should have been focusing heavily on reducing its tech and operations footprint (system and personnel redundancy/duplication) to control cost.

Instead, the CIO and President of Investment Services, both who are no longer with the organization, invested in NEXEN, Digital Pulse, and other new tech that was never going to provide business value or have a solid ROI.

Shame on them.

Good post @YZbl4go-5zln . Couldn’t agree more.

by
| 1321 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Z4vXuda

6 replies (most recent on top)

NEXEN - what a joke

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6ywa+Z4vXuda

I agree with this narrative. Thanks for sharing it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fif+Z4vXuda

We will find out next week the next level of carnage.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ldg+Z4vXuda

Which lobs? The profitable or the unprofitable? Who would buy?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wyf+Z4vXuda

We have more planners, managers and supposed support than workers of clients at this point. Whatever they do won't change anything. Downturn is happening and most of us short of upper MGMT will pay for it one way or another. Might as well just accept it folks..... This is our foreseeable reality. I really wish upper MGMT will just tell us what they plan to cut and get it done with already. They keep talking location reduction as well. Will they close some US offices? These are things they should just share at this point.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ymc+Z4vXuda

Folks, OP of this thread here...

I would like to add that I also wrote meet the new boss, same as the old boss in the original thread.

I’m absolutely not a fan of the current leadership’s strategy or the people who occupy these positions.

You can’t cut your way to prosperity without fixing the underlying issues within your business and I see none of that happening.

Project greenfield (capital intensive tech initiative under the guise of risk and resiliency) isn’t going to get this done but it does set the company up for future divestitures.

“Leadership” is pulling a short term lever to buy some time and divest certain LOBs should they find a buyer at the right price.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pup+Z4vXuda

Post a reply

: