Is there any discussion about some how bringing back the HS Ambassadors? We may not need 2 per each campus, but we need something or all that we've done in the last year is a waste. Why not have an Admissions rep who enrolls also follow through with generating the HS leads? Two in One? Anyone? It just seemed that it has totally gone to the wayside yet we still have group people on staff.
6 replies (most recent on top)
Thanks for nothing SAE. Thanks for using us and then spitting us out.
The HS leader was awesome, but not completely supported I think.
That would have been a better, thought out plan
Very poorly planned out to say the least. They should have started out small....having 1 ambassador per campus. Run that for an entire year and then see how the intake from their leads would go. Once you do that then you can get a gauge of how many leads/enrollments could be generated. If they had generated a fair number of leads then in certain markets increase the team to 2. Nashville had 2 ambassadors. There aren't enough high school seniors in Nashville to justify 2 ambassadors.....dumb move. Nashville only needed 1. Atlanta, Cali and Chicago yes 2 ambassadors are needed with the large number of high school seniors. Finally the High School Ambassadors were over sold to Navitas and SAE Group as what I call it "over promised and over sold" with what they could do without fully knowing what they actually could or could not do in each individual market. At the end of the day SAE will sink back into being a little obscure music school no one has ever heard of and only being mentioned by way of word of mouth
I think it was just poorly planned out. The timing of when to start them and all.
I doubt they'll bring it back to how it was before. It was too costly. But I agree that cutting it down to the few people is not enough to truly have a HS program.