Thank you Post ID: @2gib+1q2q9y4M . What you said was exactly what I was thinking about Post ID: @2oyd+1q2q9y4M : Regarding researching the titles ! Job applicants DO read the job descriptions and the titles. Citi HR embellishes the job descriptions to make it seem like the job is more than it is or is at the same level as in Real, Profitable Companies like JPMorgan Chase, BofA, Goldman, etc.. As others have posted, they too noticed that a Citi VP is a half-witted bozo who needs hand-holding like an intern and more like an AVP or worse yet an Analyst in JPMC, Goldman, BofA etc.. Same with Citi SVP is a VP at Citi's Profitable Competitors. Citi is so sad, pitiful and pathetic. With reference to Post ID: @2oyd+1q2q9y4M 's comments about promotions due to tenure or in-seat promotions, JPMC, Goldman, BofA, Morgan Stanley etc. Promote In-Seat Unlike Citi. Unlike Citi, they're Profitable and Successful and so, they must be doing something Right or several things Right. Since Citi idolizes and worships its G0ds JPMorgan Chase, BofA, Goldman etc.. promoting In-Seat or due to tenure may be one of the infinite attributes of its Successful Competitors that Citi should emulate! AND FYI, the VOE that Citi spends Shareholders' Money on every year is meant as a roadmap to tell Citi what, how and where to CHANGE for the World, its Clients, Current Employees-Svckers, and Prospective Employees, NOT the other way around! Citi wants its Employees to change for Citi, when the OPPOSITE should and must happen. Citi is using or believes the VOE is a tool to get its Employees and Clients to Change for and Bend to the Will of Citi. NOT !!! Wrong Premise from the Non-Sequitur Joke "bank" that has Citi Genius Employees (the half-witted B0zos other posters referred to) who mistakenly wired out US$900 Million Free Money to Revlon's creditors!