Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

EM has a gaslighting problem

There are too many reasons to list here, but the thing that broke the camels back for me was the constant attempts at gaslighting. I understand a company has to keep up their reputation in the public eye and will gloss over things, but when gaslighting becomes the MO in everyday business, it becomes impossible to work.

It started to become apparent the company choosing toxic manipulation when DW sent an email in 2020 saying there will be no layoffs while knowing he intended to do much worse. So, instead of layoffs, he’d force retirement s and direct management to gaslight employees into thinking they were unproductive by pass out PIPs at random. They did all this to avoid any bad press that came from layoffs.

From that moment on, it seems gaslighting has taken center stage in our business plan.

Over the years, when we would have to accept something from the higher ups that went against logic, at least my manager would admit it was wrong or at least a bad idea. Now, that no longer happens.

Earlier this year, my manager (whom I’m fairly close with) tried to convince me that a fact was not a fact. I had proof (emails, test results, etc.) He flat out refused to back down. It was a bizarre encounter. I knew then that the rot had seeped so deep that there was no way I could continue to work there. Since then, these crazy mental games have happened too often to count with many people throughout the company.

I’m out at the end of the year.

An excellent post from @drg+1k9sqdjO, it deserved a bump to the top.

by
| 1994 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kjLM7sm

12 replies (most recent on top)

@1oup Use of the word “gaslighting” on this board reflects an abuse of vocabulary and a misunderstanding of what it actually entails.

This is just more hyperbole from the disgruntled 50-something’s who are stuck at Exxon because they need the money and can’t do any better.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xpi+1kjLM7sm

Gaslighting reflects the lack of leadership. When managers have to resort to manipulations, hiding information, threats/ promise of rewards, shaming, gaslighting, and other subversive tactics, then they have not earned the rights to lead. A fancy title does not equate to leadership.

All the perks… the titles, the bigger salaries, the nice office…. is given by others and it is temporary. All of this more about the lack of respect and unfortunately the lack of leaders that have been promoted in the ranks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1oup+1kjLM7sm

@1gmh All I did was repeat what you and your colleagues have posted here.

I’m not the one with the exaggeration problem.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rek+1kjLM7sm

@1scc+1kjLM7sm

Stop with the exaggerations.

  1. Hot desking - employees should have a good place to work and leaders should live by the same standards. How about if the VPs hot desk? I’ve seen VPs at other companies sit in open areas with their teams because of cost savings or space constraints. Perhaps if they do this at EM, it will improve morale.
  1. When managers who have little experience continuously pressure people who are knowledgable in the field to support their ideas for personal gains, that is gas lighting… pure and simple. Don’t dismiss or minimize other people’s experiences.
  1. Don’t minimize other’s experiences. Zoom and work overload is real for many. Some supervisors are not doing their jobs or oblivious to staffing problems or simply squeezing more out of their people.
  1. A company should pay competitive or prevailing wages to the workforce for that region. Highly skilled people who gets paid over $225K can walk away if other companies are offering more in terms of total package. It is not a sense of entitlement. It is knowing your worth.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gmh+1kjLM7sm

I like the way gas lights flicker.

All lighting on campus should be gaslighting.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yfv+1kjLM7sm

@1kje The issue the US (and EM) really have is with hyperbole and entitlement.

Here’s a few examples, some taken from recent threads:

  1. Hot-desking = “dehumanizing” (yes, grown adults actually said this)
  2. Being told what I don’t want to hear = “gaslighting”
  3. Being required to wear a mask indoors = “totalitarian”
  4. Logging into a computer for a Zoom call = “overworked”
  5. Annual salary of $225k/year = “underpaid” (see item 4 above)

………

The sense of entitlement among EM employees is utterly obnoxious, and their use of hyperbole attains the level of satire. I’ve never seen anything like it anywhere.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1scc+1kjLM7sm

USA in general has a gaslighting issue. We are getting what we deserve on both fronts. We didnt fight and foster our country nor our companies .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kje+1kjLM7sm

EM produces a lot of gas.

We should encourage gaslighting, gasheating, and gas electricity generating.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ogy+1kjLM7sm

@OP You don’t appear to have a full grasp of what gaslighting entails.

Here’s a hint: if you think a recession is imminent or already occurring, you’ve been successfully gas-lit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wfp+1kjLM7sm

Not just an EM issue. Fortune 100s today are consumed with irrational decisions, poor leadership, bizarre anti-revenue strategy pivots, copious hypocrisy, and ridiculous virtue-signaling agendas that pit employee groups against each other. Corporate echelons on the verge of breaking down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @six+1kjLM7sm

Morale would be much better today if they had just been transparent about the need for layoffs and paid severance to the employees let go.

Instead our VP got on a call and told us that the NSI's were designed to be helpful to employees, and that 90% of the PIPs passed. So really they were doing a favor to the employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @agd+1kjLM7sm

It really did feel like that first round of pips was really random didn't it? I assure you it was not, also no pips this next cycle.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @grt+1kjLM7sm

Post a reply

: