Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Get rid of incompetent management

One of my managers constantly wants to block me from using benefits the way the company lays them out in policy, and spends significant amounts of time to document things against me or just other stupid sh-t that has no value for the customer. I’m a high performing tac engineer who is regularly noticed by CU for exemplary customer service, which is actually pretty damn rare in tac right now sadly.

My team has two managers and an off shift TCE who does not do technical work, but makes the schedule, fields process questions for engineers, communicates with other team leads, etc. he does not assist engineers technically.

So we have three managers, and one spot that is supposed to be technical is clogged up with a guy doing admin work. That guy should actually be the manager, and we should get rid of the incompetent manager who is sadly not smart enough to keep up and make decisions to advance things for CU/engineer.

You don’t have to be technical to understand how to move cases forward or ask relevant questions.

All this guy can do to look valuable is regurgitate corporate speak and worry about if someone is “abusing” benefit policy in his eyes…

Another example. As a test I included both my managers in CC for an RMA issue I could not move forward without guidance..

IMMEDIATELY the manager I don’t report to who is good reaches out, schedules a meeting to get the answers I need and essentially move the case forward for the customer…

Later that day my manager wants to 1:1 and repeat the same stupid sh-t he said in the last 50 team meetings, and criticize me because I hurt his feelings the way I talked to him (directly… no foul language or insubordination… just straight up directness)

It’s not only this one manager either, Cisco is full of these types of incompetent people who can’t find their way out of a wet sack let alone make executive decisions that enable engineers to deliver for customers.

Don’t even get me started on GFEP people and grind/ahims who do literally nothing except ask you to write their summaries for them, and interrupt you mid troubleshooting conversation to ask some bs questions they need to check out of the meeting audio and watch Netflix again….

Look I don’t care and I’m far from the hardest worker (because Cisco will never pay me enough to slave my whole life away) but we have to get rid of these d-mb a-s layers of people who don’t do anything but slow everyone else down.

Take the guy off my team and give him manager title… get rid of the incompetent guy, and give us another technical person…. We don’t need someone repeating hash tags and corporate speak to us in the chat rooms each morning…

by
| 1443 views | | 11 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1rv66mOa

11 replies (most recent on top)

How can you lead people when you don't know what they do day to day

Isn't that what daily SCRUM meetings are for if you're in an Agile team?

Or what weekly team status calls are for where everyone does a round table discussion on what they did last week and what they're working on this week?

Or what bi-weekly 1:1's are for?

Or listing what you're doing this week in Team Space weekly check-in's?

Or creating Jira tickets to track your work?

I spend more time duplicating that same info in Team Space, weekly team status calls, Jira, and 1:1's. Thank GOD I'm not on an Agile team and do daily scrum stand-up calls. If my manager doesn't know what I'm working on, then my manager is incompetent because the data is there.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7faw+1rv66mOa
How can you lead people when you don't know what they do day to day

Yeah, micromanagers are true managers!?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7nax+1rv66mOa

What you are saying is all true, but unfortunately managers and directors are thoroughly protected by HR and David of HR in Ireland.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7xrx+1rv66mOa

It's crazy to see how many leaders do not have close relationships with their teams

How can you lead people when you don't know what they do day to day

Channel leadership in MEA is rotten lost leaders that think it's 2005 and Cisco has a monopoly

Who cares about winning business when you can ride the wave of AMs and ISRs force feeding your useless partners

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3bvl+1rv66mOa

And from all the other threads retreading the same topic, "get rid of the incompetent worker bees as well."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jsx+1rv66mOa
Umm, unjustified is a stretch. It’s because of us YOU have a job.

@1cab+1rv66mOa, it's not because of "sales" that TAC has a job. It's because of how buggy our code is. TAC may support sales, but if we had quality, bug-free code, we wouldn't need as large a BU as TAC.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jnn+1rv66mOa

“ What’s unjustified is sales guys doing 3 meetings a week and two webinars a month hitting 170k ”

  1. It’s more like $270
  2. Umm, unjustified is a stretch. It’s because of us YOU have a job.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cab+1rv66mOa

Hate to tell you sales makes more than 170K. Try 300K+ on plan.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nmj+1rv66mOa

@1vdp+1rv66mOa

Doubling the salary is a hard stretch, and if you’ve never work 28/30 days of a month I don’t want to hear about what is unjustified.

What’s unjustified is sales guys doing 3 meetings a week and two webinars a month hitting 170k while you’re tac engineers who drive most revenue at the end of the day struggle to break 5 0’s

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mfm+1rv66mOa

Some folks in TAC double their salary in overtime which is overkill and unjustified.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vdp+1rv66mOa

You actually had a discussion about hurting someones feelings?!?! As I like to remind some people, being a constant pain in someone else's a$$ is NOT a value added position.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yrl+1rv66mOa

Post a reply

: