Thread regarding Ford layoffs

Ford does not know who the low performers are

In order to let go the "low performers", first we have to know who they are. At FMC, it is hard for middle management to know who are the "low performers".
Some slackers easily trick the clueless management into thinking their projects are more important, more complex and more time consuming than the actual workload is. I have seen in this company people dragging easy projects for months and looking good while they are at it.
Other slackers have the protection of some LLx, and they always look good in paper, no matter what a backstabbing, credit stealing piece of sh!t they actually are.
Personally, I don't think F can get rid of the "low performers" until the company make profound changes in its internal policies. Moreover, I do not think upper management cares about getting rid of "low performers", but getting rid of all NA white collar force.


Couldn't agree more, @1wad+1hGPqIrm. But I think it's difficult to expect that Ford will suddenly start recognizing who the real poor performers are?

by
| 1960 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1hJBMQaW

5 replies (most recent on top)

Add Cannis to the list

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sdy+1hJBMQaW

The captain obvious LL low performers: Kierstan, Jennings, Kumar, Frick, Farley

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hpb+1hJBMQaW

@1zph+1hJBMQaW

You got us there- I'll give you two thumbs up for that one. Those in Purchasing do suck.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ijo+1hJBMQaW

I know who/where most of the low performers are. Most LL6s in purchasing. They got to their positions based on brown nosing and have very little actual skill.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zph+1hJBMQaW

It really does not matter who the high/low performers are.

Ford does know who will be the losers: those who are not in the friend and family plan.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bbe+1hJBMQaW

Post a reply

: