Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Chevron looks to reduce operating expenses as it steps up production

Energy giant Chevron Corp. is working to reduce operating expenses related to its production of oil and fuels and increase its output.

The San Ramon, Calif.-based oil major in January reported profit of $15.6 billion for 2021, up from a loss of $5.5 billion in 2020. It brought down costs during the Covid-19 pandemic. Its $5 billion acquisition of Noble Energy Inc. in 2020 gave Chevron additional exposure to the Permian Basin in West Texas and added several mature, less-risky assets to its portfolio. Operating expenses last year totaled $20.73 billion, down 3.1% from 2019, when the company said it would restructure its operations.

Chevron last year produced an equivalent of 3.1 million barrels of oil per day. It said it expects production to rise at a compound annual growth rate of at least 3% through 2025.

Chief Financial Officer Pierre Breber discussed layoffs, cutting back on operating costs and how to get more out of its capital investments. This is the fourth part of a series that focuses on how CFOs reduce debt and other costs. Edited excerpts follow.

WSJ: What have you done to reduce expenses?

Mr. Breber: We’re a much better company than we were a few years ago because we are more capital- and cost-efficient. I wouldn’t necessarily call it a cut in capital, [but] an improvement in capital and cost efficiency. We can get the same business results for less capital. We gave guidance [in March] to lower our cost per barrel [of oil] by 10% over the next five years. So it’s a unit cost and you can do that, both by becoming more cost efficient, but also by having underlying production growth.

WSJ: Your head count last year fell 10.8% to 42,595 compared with a year earlier. To what extent did you cut staff?

Mr. Breber: We did, as part of our enterprisewide transformation. We’ve been operating under the new model for more than a year. We did have reductions in staff. The majority of them were essentially voluntary and then some were involuntary.

WSJ: How much net debt do you have?

WSJ: How are you managing your capital investments?

Mr. Breber: Our capital expenditures are up this year by nearly 30%—to an expected $15 billion from $11.7 billion [in 2021]—and then [they] will be in a flattish range. We’re clearly going to have more cost pressure. We deliberately reduced capital when Covid hit because we didn’t want to add short-term supply in markets that were oversupplied. We didn’t know exactly how long it was going to go on, but we expected it to get back to that prior investment level [of about $14 billion]. Now we’re on that level.

Demand has bounced back faster. Supply’s trying to catch up. There’s been a lag and then, of course, you have geopolitical risk that has increased commodity prices in general and including oil, and it’s a fast-moving environment.

WSJ: How are you affected by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine?

Mr. Breber: We were in a recovery even before the [Russian] war with Ukraine was under way. We do not have exploration production activities in Russia like a number of our peers do.

WSJ: Do you have tips for other CFOs on how to become more efficient?

Mr. Breber: We are a big company, but we’re not everywhere and we don’t do everything. We pick our spots. If you think of our downstream business, we’re primarily on the U.S. West Coast, U.S. Gulf Coast and parts of Asia. That’s a very focused portfolio. It’s easy for companies to think you can do more than you can and that’s when you tend to get cost inefficient.

https://www.livemint.com/industry/energy/chevron-looks-to-reduce-operating-expenses-as-it-steps-up-production-11649161629356.html

by
| 2317 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1g6BCLgy

12 replies (most recent on top)

The stock isn't going to triple in another two years. It's not going to triple in another 20 years.

Offer every exec $20MM in ten year options based on today's stock price and $1 / year in salary and none of them will take it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4dpv+1g6BCLgy

Moving forward, it's going to be really hard to reduce operating expenses in the Permian, as all the sweet spots will have been drilled by 2025...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3jzg+1g6BCLgy

No original thoughts of your own so you simply copy & paste something that anyone here can read and most already have? What's the point?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ydp+1g6BCLgy

"Reducing operating expenses" is MW's broken-record pronouncement for 15 years now. He has accomplished this by converting Chevron into a sweatshop, coupled with layoffs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3kku+1g6BCLgy

Average salary at CVX is $110,000/yr so four times that is about $450k/yr. That is like PSG26 when you include bonus and stock. Execs would be happy to work for $1/yr if the stock keeps tripling like it has since 2020.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2nnm+1g6BCLgy

@2hhh, He thinks that he has led the company just as all others have before him, including with regards to layoffs. Your point?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2cvb+1g6BCLgy

I just have to wonder what MW thinks that his legacy is one of an extreme obsession with layoffs. I know he has his millions, yachts and multiple homes but I for one would not want to be know as a guy with a layoff addiction who constantly ruined the lives of many.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hhh+1g6BCLgy

Reduce executive compensation to a maximum of 4 times that of the average company salary.
Ensure that for every worker bee(25 and below) laid off to satisfy MW layoff obsesion an equivalent number of PSG 26 and above along with hipots are also shown the door

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bwz+1g6BCLgy

Close all the offices and sell the real estate so everyone can work from home. That could be another $1 billion savings right their.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gmt+1g6BCLgy

Sure seems like MW is starting to get the lack of layoff jitters again. He really needs to lay people off soon!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ini+1g6BCLgy

Outsource all of that and then you'll be complaining about how bad the quality is and how you get tired of dealing with people from overseas who you can barely understand. Most likely you support "Made in the USA" and "America first" and then cry to outsource which will mean US jobs lost. Stop thinking about only corporate profits for once.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cnk+1g6BCLgy

Want to reduce operating expenses? Some low-hanging fruit: 1) Completely outsource HR. 2) Significantly oursource IT to Microsoft. 3) Cut your financial and procurement staff in half.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rvj+1g6BCLgy

Post a reply

: