Don't these analysts learn from the other analysts that previously made similar predictions and wound-up with mud on their faces?
https://247wallst.com/investing/2026/07/20/why-dan-ives-maintains-his-sky-high-target-on-ibm-after-its-largest-crash-ever/
It’s because they’re on the payroll
I took the time to read through the link provided by the @OP. This is pure gibberish.
Talk is cheap, When these analysts are held accountable, their words would have a meaning.
Talk is cheap. If these analysts were held accountable and punished for misleading.