Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Poll: Who is the worst Intel CEO of all time?

Pick your choice:

Robert N. Noyce, 1968-1975

Gordon E. Moore, 1975-1987

Andrew S. Grove, 1987-1998

Craig R. Barrett, 1998-2005

Paul S. Otellini, 2005-2013

Brian M. Krzanich, 2013-2018

Bob Swan , 2019-2021

Pat Gelsinger, 2021-present

by
| 2872 views | | 31 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1tZw21xp

31 replies (most recent on top)

BK and PG. Both unable to see the big picture and unable to adapt to a changing industry.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gtx+1tZw21xp

Worked under most of them. Pains me to say but a lot of the blame can be laid at Grove's feet. His practice of focusing on promoting non-technical talent and fast tracking TA's to Exec staff had significant negative long term ramifications IMO.

HR also should be held responsible. They destroyed Intel's culture and drove out a lot of incredible technical talent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4fzw+1tZw21xp

BK. The mafia boss.... mohsen fazlian his mafia soldier is still around..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3gql+1tZw21xp

BK, no other choice

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3xtv+1tZw21xp

BK. He owns the EUV disaster. Pay back that fat salary Brian! It's not too late to do the right thing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2naw+1tZw21xp

BK by a long shot. They all had flaws and made mistakes, but BK was by far the worst.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xmo+1tZw21xp

BK.
The only area he was competent was eliminating any potential successors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1shf+1tZw21xp

Anyone not selecting BK doesn't have enough info to be answering this question. I have been here since Grove. Every CEO did something wrong, but there's a difference between missteps and flat out negligence. PSO wanted to change the business in positive ways but was hamstrung by the powerful technical leaders. BK flat out milked the cash cow until the cow was on life support. BS was just palliative care for the cow. PG is like a guy with one shovel following a parade of a million horses... there's no overcoming the accumulation of sh*t. CB was OK operationally but wasted so much money on hare-brained acquisitions... Intel had no coherent business strategy or plan to guide those acquisitions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gcb+1tZw21xp

B K

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mjz+1tZw21xp

Only the Paranoid Survived !
Inflection - Reflection in the Mirror Point !
x86 legacy gone with the wind !
NVidia wins the horse races for the next 8 Qtrs ! Intel AMD ARM Samsung Qualcomm all in a distant last place !
NVidia got off its azz and innovated and marketed CPU GPU NPU server and customer computing ! Line change or be gone !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wdv+1tZw21xp

First past time CEO Otellini : INTC stocks dropped from $145 high to $12 low during his tenure ( > 90% ) at some points
Second runner up current CEO Pat INTC stocks dropped from $60 high to current $20 low ( > 67% ) at the moment and will claim the title if INTC stock goes below $5 a share.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hiw+1tZw21xp

Otellini - the miss on mobile with Apple; needed to switch architecture to ARM was the beginning on this decline. I remember someone who bought a Lenovo with a X86 processor. The phone was so hot you could hardly hold it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tsh+1tZw21xp

Worked under all but Noyce and Moore. BK for sure gets my vote.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mma+1tZw21xp

PSO just plain stupid in daylight

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lgv+1tZw21xp

But Pat will be known forever as the man who destroyed Intel. The sooner he accepts this the better.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1afd+1tZw21xp

First worse award:

Barrett spent big money like a drunken sailor on shore leave, on any Technology company that Intel might be able to use. Then he either replaced their successful management with Intel management, or subverted original managers to Intel VPs. When the businesses eventually failed Intel sold the assets off at fire sale prices.

Second worst award:
BK because he treated everything Intel like a Fab. Peter principle personified.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nat+1tZw21xp

BK hands down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dcf+1tZw21xp

Andy was the St-lin. The rest follow the Soviet story.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1thk+1tZw21xp

After Andy Grove, rest of the pack didn't foresee what was to come and act on it. As long as the PC cash cow was rolling out with a predictable refresh cycle, things were ok. The contrarian thought to another architecture wasn't encouraged. It was always a manufacturing company first and that attitude percolated. However, the technological leap over time became more and more difficult and the culture of innovation with a sense of urgency did not continue which is why Intel is where it is today. The continuous slips with the toxic culture led to the decline rapidly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jip+1tZw21xp

To @OP
https://www.tekinsil.com/SemiconductorsBill/US_Semiconductor_Bill.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ehh+1tZw21xp

Gotta go with BK but I think the rot started under Paul

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kyz+1tZw21xp

But we can all agree Pat is the s-xiest!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @idx+1tZw21xp

BK

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pzu+1tZw21xp

PG without a doubt.
He is spending Intel into oblivion on fabs that nobody wants. He’s building a bridge to nowhere and taking Intel down with him and his megamaniacal ego where he actually thinks he’s the savior of western civilization.

At least the priors had the sense to keep enough financial cushion to survive and fight. Yes, even BK and BS.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ykz+1tZw21xp

Every single one of them after Grove su-ked. Otelline su-king the least. Very little to no vision.

That said however a lot of employees today would quit under Grove. Bring back the late list, the 10% solution, he-l people freak out with RTO today.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hzm+1tZw21xp

Andy Bryant. He was never the king , but sh---y king maker.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dzw+1tZw21xp

All of them!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @llj+1tZw21xp

BK. Had BK never been promoted, the company had a chance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tik+1tZw21xp

Craig R. Barrett. When he became CEO. The original Intel culture began to be erased and replaced by corporate wanks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wrj+1tZw21xp

BK. The death spiral started on his watch.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qlj+1tZw21xp

Before PG: $61.81
After PG: $20.47

'Nuff said.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vsp+1tZw21xp

Post a reply

: