Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Half of 2023's fossil-fuel carbon emissions tied to 36 companies

State-owned entities
Saudi Aramco 1,839 MtCO2 in CO2 emissions 4.4%
Coal India 1,548 3.7
CHN Energy 1,533 3.7
Jinneng Group 1,228 2.9
National Iranian Oil Co 1,262 2.8

Investor-owned companies
ExxonMobil 562 1.3
Chevron 487 1.1
Shell 418 0.9
TotalEnergies 359 0.8
BP 347 0.8
Data: The Carbon Majors database; Chart: Axios Visuals

A new analysis finds that a few companies are responsible for much of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, and that state-owned firms dominate the list of top emitters compared to investor-owned oil and gas companies.

Why it matters: Tying historical fossil-fuel emissions to specific companies can establish accountability for climate change-related harms.

Such accountability is taking the form of new laws as well as legal and regulatory action.
Zoom in: The "Carbon Majors Database" from the London-based climate think tank InfluenceMap shows that state-owned companies were tied to a majority — 52% — of global emissions in 2023.

Just 36 oil, gas, coal and cement producers contributed more than 50% of the world's fossil fuel-linked CO2 emissions.

In all, 16 out of the top 20 global emitters in the database, which traces emissions from 1854 through 2023, are state-owned entities.

The new report released Wednesday shows that many of the world's biggest emitters increased their emissions in 2023 compared to the previous year.

This was particularly true with the energy-intensive cement industry.

The intrigue: As was the case in 2022, Chinese companies contributed more fossil fuel-related CO2 emissions than companies from any other country, befitting the world's top emitter.

Chinese companies were responsible for 23% of global fossil fuel and cement CO2 emissions in 2023, the report found.

The top state-owned companies were led by Saudi Aramco, which was responsible for 4.38% of global CO2 emissions.

The top investor-owned companies were on the hook for a lower percentage of global emissions, led by ExxonMobil at 1.28% and Shell and Chevron with about 1% each.

Between the lines: This is the first year the database includes detailed information on coal emissions from China, Russia and several other nations, rather than only national-level details.

This shows that CHN Energy, a Chinese coal company, was the third-biggest emitter of fossil fuel-related CO2 in 2023, and the 14th largest historically.

Yes, but: The Carbon Majors database largely assigns responsibility for global emissions, and hence human-caused climate change, to companies that extract fossil fuels.

Other ways of accounting for climate change responsibility could look further down the chain to power companies that burn the fuels, automakers and others.

Zoom out: The database was first produced in 2013 and is now an annual report produced by InfluenceMap.

It has been cited in efforts to pass climate superfund laws in Vermont and New York.
In addition, researchers have used its findings to tie extreme weather events to specific companies, rather than just carbon emissions in general.

Advocacy groups are also using it for legal actions against fossil fuel companies and leaders.

What they're saying: "While a few profit-driven corporations continue to expand fossil fuel infrastructure, climate disasters are hitting hardest in regions where people have contributed the least," said Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, in a statement.

"A global turnaround is not just urgent — it's essential, and it must start with these key players."

https://www.axios.com/2025/03/05/fossil-fuel-emissions-world-biggest-emitters

by
| 1267 views | | 9 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jnrka1jg

9 replies (most recent on top)

Just for giggles, all Refineries and Chemical plants and Gas Producers should stop production midnight 31 July and provide zero products for the month of August.

Anti oil groups would demand immediate restart of all production and would demand new legislation to forbid any future production stoppages.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tb+1jnrka1jg

All driven by demand so people need to look in the mirror. Fuel dr-gs what have you. If a product needs to be supplied a for profit supply chain will support that demand until the demand ceases to exist. In the developed countries are they going to give up the carbon fuel dense lifestyle not a chance. Will developing nations say oh no the environment nope. Same thing with the illicit dr-gs that wont stop until all the consumers are dead. Until we meet again ......................

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sr+1jnrka1jg

Every consumer of hydrocarbons is an accomplice. Do not just blame suppliers.

The production of hydrocarbons and all advancements in society enabled by hydrocarbons are responsible for the increase in life expectancy.

Nobody complains about the benefits of hydrocarbons and those green screamers would scream louder if all hydrocarbon producers stopped production later today.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j7+1jnrka1jg

Nobody cares Greta!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f1+1jnrka1jg

The whole climate change push is a scam to scare low intelligent people. If the United States government really cared about pollution they would quit buying everything from China.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eq+1jnrka1jg

@ay+1jnrka1jg

The ranking is the same for 2025 and most countries around the world do care.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bd+1jnrka1jg

It isn’t 2020, OP. Nobody cares. Go live in a cave

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ay+1jnrka1jg

@ac+1jnrka1jg Yes, I blame the consumer also for all the dr-g problems in America, all of you should be imprisoned and the dealers left to roam free.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1jnrka1jg

These companies don't wake up and say "Hey, how can we pollute more". If consumers stopped purchasing their products, they would stop producing them and the emissions would cease

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jnrka1jg

Post a reply

: