Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Chevron Attorney's Lack of Integrity

Anyone else have experience with Chevron's attorney's submitting obvious false statements under oath where the written evidence contradicts their written statements?

by
| 2210 views | | 23 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1sv5USpJ

23 replies (most recent on top)

Not under oath, but in daily practice, every single day.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nklg+1sv5USpJ

50% of all attorneys graduate at the bottom half of their class and this is the pool Chevron hires from.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9lbd+1sv5USpJ

I'm generally happy with all our attornies, I just wonder sometimes why we have so many. I mean, there are like hundreds if you look them up on whitepages. Seems like an over ki-l to me. My opinion only.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6hgh+1sv5USpJ

Drilled down and found the main nerve and the attorney's unite to portray something they are not. Apparently attorney's can't take responsibility for their actions. Blame others and deny responsbility. No wonder attorney's are not well thought of in this company or any other.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6itc+1sv5USpJ

In my experience they're bumbling backstabbing money grubbers. They're only revered because the employees they're around have relatively simple lives that don't involve observing the bizarre behavior of an attorney.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3caf+1sv5USpJ

"I don't think anyone doubted you had a good experience with a Chevron attorney."
which one would that be from your description of the "liars and deniers"?
Just wondering.
BTW, I don't give a flyin flip what your opinion about CVX lawyers are. But I can assure you that blanket false statements on junk websites from disgruntled employees are worth every penny paid for them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3sjn+1sv5USpJ

I don't think anyone doubted you had a good experience with a Chevron attorney. I simply stated my experience which is obviously different from yours. But to think that every Chevron attorney is good because of your experience is naive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3xsz+1sv5USpJ

You are 100% correct sir! No evidence for the liars and deniers of the legal issues that I had excellent help from the CVX attorneys with dealing with contractors. This site is a theatre for fake news, but don't let that stop you from providing some evidence.
We'll wait.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rcf+1sv5USpJ

Good to see the Chevron liars and deniers on a layoff site out in full force. No evidence to support the denials only what they want people to believe. If you think Chevron safety violations are not discussed internally, with Chevron attorney's, you have no idea what you are talking about.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qzu+1sv5USpJ

You can be more creative than that with your fake stories. C'mon man! That last one was a dud that's been reused over and over. You don't use a CVX attorney to discuss internal CVX safety issues with anyway. You need an outside one. Try harder, liars.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hxy+1sv5USpJ

I met with a Chevron attorney to discuss safety issues. I showed him many pictures of workers exposed to toxic chemicals without proper ppe. Attorney acknowledged the obvious safety issues and then proceeded to cover it up as fast as he could.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ler+1sv5USpJ

I have had nothing but good experiences with the CVX attorneys regarding the legal issues that I had to clear up with contractors. They were very up front and accountable. Yet it sure is easy to lie and create falsehoods on an anonymous website while hiding behind your keyboard like a little coward, we know all about that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ash+1sv5USpJ

I have also worked with Chevron attorney's and was lied to and mislead. Then they covered up and hid results. It appears integrity does not apply to Chevron attorney's.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qnr+1sv5USpJ

I have personally worked with CVX attorneys regarding contractor performance issues and potential over charges. I find them to be reliable and helpful in resolving the issues. I admit that they aren't a fun bunch to be around, but I like that fact that they take their work seriously.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kzi+1sv5USpJ

I'd like a Penthouse SUITE instead thanks, rotfl!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rri+1sv5USpJ

I see Chevron's attorney's monitor this site, are b___ hurt with the truth, and down vote to try and hide their incompetence.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wxy+1sv5USpJ

But what did the law SUITES ever do to them? Are they just angry at real estate in general? 😜

Also, is correct spelling a dying skill?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uul+1sv5USpJ

Chevron attorneys are rewarded entirely on how much money they save by fighting back real law suites.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ywr+1sv5USpJ

Chevron attorney's are all DEI so actually being qualified is not a requirement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fzs+1sv5USpJ

Chevron legal is the epic center of the current corruption hands down. In other similar corporations, the legal team proactively focus on compliance and social justices elements. In Chevron, "they fight until the he-l freeze" to protect corruption and Chevron criminal activities. What is even a bigger disaster is whatever they do overseas is ten times worse than what they do in the US. Chevron legal needs to go back to the days of Charles A. James where the legal team held much higher levels of ethics and integrity despite all challenges they were facing at that time rather than what they became as the soulless attorneys who do the dirty work to cover up on corruption.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mye+1sv5USpJ

@oem - it is a common practice for companies to be represented by outside counsel in litigation. This done as those attorneys are generally admitted to the relevant bar, some may have specific technical expertise, and they have direct litigation experience in court. This isn’t something unique to Chevron.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tsi+1sv5USpJ

There's a lot of pathetic butthurt loser employees on this site who seriously need to either start their own company so that they can run it like they want to, or go work for a company where they approve of the way it's run. Why is that so hard?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lfv+1sv5USpJ

Donziger was the poster child for corrupt attorney. Chevron had outside attorney's represent Chevron as Chevron attorney's don't have the knowledge or experience to handle that type of case. However, Chevron attorney's have learned from Donziger to fabricate evidence when documents contradict Chevron's attorney representations. I would think Chevron could have learned what not to do instead of joining in the corruption.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oem+1sv5USpJ

Post a reply

: