Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM Just Can’t Compete With Current Board (Investor Place, July 20, 2019)

If you’re a regular InvestorPlace reader and own shares of IBM (NYSE:IBM), you might be familiar with some of my articles criticizing CEO Ginni Rometty. She’s a big reason I wouldn’t own IBM stock.

Linux-maker Red Hat Purchase Adds Risk to Owning IBM StockSource: JHVEPhoto / Shutterstock.com
There are other reasons, including Warren Buffett selling the last of his International Business Machines stock on May 2018 after a costly seven-year hold, but it is Rometty’s eight-year run as CEO that I believe more than anything has destroyed IBM’s chance at regaining its former glory.

While I freely admit I don’t know Rometty and wouldn’t recognize her if I ran into her on the street, I do believe her technology chops aren’t up to speed to other women working in the industry. Her background, for better or worse, is in sales and marketing, not technology.

Sure, she recognized Red Hat was an excellent way to springboard IBM’s cloud ambitions, but almost anyone in her position would be fully aware of the acquisition opportunities out there.

In my last article about IBM, I facetiously suggested that General Electric (NYSE:GE) should merge with IBM so GE CEO Larry Culp could run the combined entity.

“Larry Culp is a proven winner. Ginni Rometty has done nothing in her 7.5 years as IBM’s CEO to demonstrate that she has the technology chops or the leadership qualities necessary to reignite the company’s former penchant for innovation,” I wrote July 26.

“I’m not saying IBM hadn’t already lost its innovation spark before Rometty became CEO in January 2012, but she’s been at Big Blue for most of her career. If she were going to make IBM great again, she would have already done it.”

Not only is Rometty past her best before date, but she has assembled a board over the last eight years that’s ancient by almost every standard. Technology companies are supposed to be young and innovative; the IBM board is anything but.

If IBM is to regain its former glory, not only should Rometty step down as CEO, but they ought to recruit some younger directors. Until both of these things happen, the IBM stock price won’t see $200 for a very long time. Here’s why.

The Average Age of the Board

In 2019, IBM appointed two new directors to its board, both women, one of whom is African American. The move is to be applauded. However, the age of the two directors is 58 (Admiral Michelle Howard) and 60 (Martha E. Pollack).

The average age of the 12 IBM board members, including the two new appointees, is 64, one year less than the traditional retirement age.

While I understand it’s hard to recruit younger candidates because they’re still in the prime of their careers, I do believe that a company trying to get its mojo back should bend over backward to make that happen in order for IBM stock to excel.

How old is the average director at Square (NYSE:SQ), considered a financial services disruptor?

It’s 55, almost a decade younger. In fact, four out of 11 of Square’s directors are younger than 50 with just one over the age of 70. Just as Ginni Rometty, Square CEO Jack Dorsey is also Chairman.

However, Dorsey co-founded Square; Rometty’s merely worked at IBM for 38 years. At the very least, the Chairman’s role at IBM should be separate from the CEO. In January 2018, I even suggested that Rometty moves into the Executive Chairman’s position, hiring an entrepreneurial CEO to lead its turnaround.

That never happened. Instead, Rometty went for the Red Hat Hail Mary.

The Bottom Line on IBM Stock

If you look at IBM’s roster of directors, none of them have high tech experience. Sure, all of them have used technology in their specific careers, but no one stands out as a real go-getter in the tech industry.

At least Square has several directors that have serious tech venture capital experience that allows them to understand the technical aspects of the company’s business better.

You would think that a company with a market cap of $120 billion would be able to find one or two directors with real-world tech experience.

Given the current composition of IBM’s board, I don’t see how it’s going to work through the Red Hat integration successfully.

Until the board gets younger and more technically bent, I remain skeptical of IBM stock’s chances.

At the time of this writing Will Ashworth did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned securities.

by
| 1912 views | | 4 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+10EMqqh1

4 replies (most recent on top)

Any younger, experienced, high-level executive prospect would be leery to join IBM; putting themselves in a position to deal with a dysfunctional Board of Directors. You're defeated before you jump in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8dgd+10EMqqh1

Make no mistake the Red Hat purchase is a Hail Mary play to mask the steady and consistent failure to manage strategic choices effectively by the Board's choice of CEO. The goal "then" was to reinvent the company into high margin high growth business, while tapering down the low-low.

Unfortunately when you're last to the starting gate and slow to make bold moves you lose. This company will continue to shrink by another 35% with margins dropping 5-10% before it reaches maturity. A strategist seeing this would say cut deep, cut fast and transform. Instead it has been a migration strategy which, so far, has cost the investor some 200% of return on investment vs. the S&P and even more against the tech index.

Yes, the Board is dysfunctional.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5xch+10EMqqh1

Very true

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2kpw+10EMqqh1

At least one of the new appointees has a technology background, though it's almost entirely in academia. The rest are long retired ex-executives from smokestack industries and financial services. I guess they got their board seats because they used to influence mainframe purchases 30 years ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tgc+10EMqqh1

Post a reply

: