Thread regarding Sam's Club layoffs

Toxic Culture

During my tenure as executive vice president of Walmart, I hired a brilliant strategist to create a marketing strategy for the Sam’s Club division.

Her results were powerful; the campaign was simple yet highly relevant. We became friendly, and I considered the hire a success until one of the team members approached me. It turned out the strategist had been incredibly hostile with her colleagues, making them feel marginalized and worthless.

This had gone on for more than a year, and many on the team were considering leaving. After being unaware of the problem for so long, I took immediate action and fired her.

The crisis didn’t end there. Though I was able to convince the team’s top talent to stay, it took years to earn back their trust. This whole situation could have played out very differently. Looking back, I see how I enabled the strategist by not looking beyond her results. And I see that the team’s hesitancy to speak up allowed the toxicity to continue unabated. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of every individual — no matter their org-chart status — to step up and lead by example in a toxic workplace culture.

From this experience, I developed several strategies to help me and my team members across the company identify how we can work together to prevent toxic cultures from taking hold. The key to this strategy is for each person to identify the role they play in either supporting or combating the culture.

Identifying the Role You Play
There are two types of team members: passive enablers and active enablers. Passive enablers — which is what I was — are typically unaware of what’s happening. They often mean well but are blinded by “achievement mode” and are focused on driving results. They get to a point where they simply don’t look further than they should and naively trust that their leaders are operating from their same value system and leadership style. In my case, I was a passive enabler because I looked no further than the results the team was delivering, maintaining my ignorance of what was happening to produce those results and continuing to enable the behavior.

Active enablers do see what is happening but fail to take action. They are crucial to combating toxic behavior because they are typically in the trenches of the problem and can best describe and document the situation. But they can be hesitant to speak up about what they are experiencing because they think they lack the status to bring a complaint forward or fear that there will be repercussions. They assume someone else will take a stand, rationalize that the situation may not be that bad, or delay action to wait for more proof to validate their uncertainty.

Taking Action
Passive enablers must have a strategy for looking deeply into how results are achieved and acting with urgency when problems arise. The best way to do so is by being visible to their teams. Simple acts of scheduling “walking around” time in the office, dropping by to say hello or having one-on-one meetings gives you practical tactics for demonstrating trust while verifying the actions and results of their team. This also gives your team sensible touchpoints for voicing concerns without the formality of setting up confidential meetings.

Active enablers need to recognize that choosing not to speak up is, in fact, a choice to support the behavior. They must recognize that they have an obligation to encourage healthy and respectful workplaces, and they can start by finding someone they trust who can offer advice on how to handle the situation or has the authority to take action.

In my case, after firing the strategist, I worked with my team to create and implement a formal engagement improvement plan that would open the communication lines from the top down. The plan included a visibility strategy, regular leadership evaluations, and a reinforcement strategy that empowered the team’s sense of accomplishment. This provided an opportunity to demonstrate and reward values-based behavior. It also instilled a culture of trust and openness for communication and concerns.

Fostering Cultural Health
When leaders communicate clearly and actively demonstrate what will not be tolerated, employees understand that their concerns will be heard and taken seriously. I failed to do this because I was blinded by the terrific results the marketing strategist was bringing in, but in the end the damage done to the team’s culture could have been far more expensive. Research shows that organizations drive better results when employees feel heard. A study found that a national restaurant chain saved $1.6 million and decreased its turnover rate by 32% when managers had access to senior leaders to share ideas and voice concerns. Additionally, several financial firms reported stronger financial and operational results when employees had more opportunities to voice their opinions.

Making the decision to speak up against a toxic culture is one of the most difficult decisions employees may face in their careers. I am grateful to the colleague who finally brought their concerns to me and am glad that I was able to move quickly to limit further damage. The experience taught me how important it is to empower everyone in an organization to hold organizations accountable.

Source: https://hbr.org/2019/08/are-you-enabling-a-toxic-culture-without-realizing-it

by
| 2260 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+10YJpr6A

6 replies (most recent on top)

We have a GM that encourages the leads to lead by intimidation! If there is not enough complaints about us we are not doing a good job!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ila+10YJpr6A

I tried that and was let go after 25 years because of a brutal regional that coached to a third. I appealed to the ethics team and my coaching removed three months after I had been replaced with their apologies for taking so long. Some culture

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yqn+10YJpr6A

It's the trickle down tale. If you have wise leaders above who act appropriately in situations, take action, and weed out the morally unfragrant leaders, you have successful upper leadership which then trickles down. It seems to me, Sam's currently is struggling to find identity. Who we are, and what we are about. Nothing wrong with very high execution standards as long as the message is coming across positively. There are positive ways to influence others, just having a GM working beside you would solve.much. hell, gimmie a fresh manager that actually.works... lol. There are some excellent upper leaders with Sam's and some not so good. Corporate is, however, very disillusioned about standards. Asking for the stars, but cant even deliver the moon. Walk in ANY Costco and you will see what excellent execution is all about. Difference? They have adequate staff and have goals and operating principles that guide their daily routine. "This is what we do, and how we do it." The switch from overnights is a grave mistake as the standards have surely dropped, just by looking at each building. FC a total mess, grocery, mess... This needs to switch back. Fix would have been to staff more associates during the day to MAINTAIN the hard work the overnight crew delivered... Maintaining is the key to success, but no matter how much you pay, nothing can replace actual bodies... Workers will get burnt out doing other peoples jobs or adding duties to their role, in some instances a role they were already struggling to COMPLETE in the first place. Disconnect at the top. Bentonville Clubs cannot serve as any scaffold for how the buildings across the nation should run...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jml+10YJpr6A

While I like what was said I can not bring myself to like it via a click. It all sounds good to confess being blinded by results but let me tell a similar tale. One that I was witness to.

Our club was hitting the numbers very well under a certain GM. That GM made the managers toe the line and any inactivity among workers was not tolerated. That GM was strict strict strict. They got high praise from the MM at the time. In the corporate eyes they were doing fine.

But that GM was ruthless and mean and backstabbing and lying. Some of out workers were treated truly bad. Real bad. Day after day week after week the MM was called and alerted to the GM's behavior and witch like attitude. But to no avail. That GM would get a heads up about a call to MM and then call in the caller to the office to threaten them.

And then one fateful day that GM was caught stealing from the company and you know what? That GM was fired right away and that MM came in and told us how they were unaware of that GM's bad attitude and how workers were being being treated. Apologies were flowing freely. All Lies. That MM knew from countless calls exactly how that GM was treating people but the numbers had been all that mattered. Up until the GM stole from the company.

Moral of the story? Very likely the originator of the article above also knew full well how nasty her strategist was but performance and numbers were all she cared about. Her awakening and attempts to fix things came way to late after too many people had been harmed.

I promise you one thing. Out of 600 remaining Sam's Clubs at least 589 Gms out there are exactly the same way as the above article writer. They do not care about you or how you are affected by the job. Either do the job or move on.....................

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @orz+10YJpr6A

All souns good, but we all know how it is now and will continue to be.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bje+10YJpr6A

I remember her those were good times, today it is not the same not 1 manager acknowledges you and what you do new associates. Get promoted by brown nosing managers its really a sad mess

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bgt+10YJpr6A

Post a reply

: