Let us not exclude Naresh Shanker, former HP and current XRX CIO who said in an interview in March 18 the following about the HP/HPE separation:
“Several facilities and sites worldwide had to be separated and secured so that we could deem ourselves separate identities and meet all the financial and regulatory requirements of standing up our public companies.”
Same guy who renamed an internal, non-customer facing IT operation as XDX “Xerox Digital eXperience” - almost as if he was unaware that particular IT arm did not face the customer.
I wonder if he is following his history - driving a separation. The elimination of 500+ finance and IT jobs from Webster associated with the Raleigh/Cary deal certainly feels like site functional separation.
The XDX name certainly feels like something larger is coming, or mgmt really feels “Digital Citizen” and those offerings will actually gain traction - unlikely.
Having a CTO acting as CIO also could imply something such as IT having a bigger role in revenue of if separated company.
There are other clear signs as well but until I am laid off I am respecting that certain information should not be shared publicly. October is coming. Clock is ticking. HP leadership is taking this ship somewhere. Plan accordingly.