Thread regarding IBM layoffs

If Red Hat's Jim Whitehurst ever became IBM's CEO, here's some insight on how he will manage

There's certainly some "CEO-speak" in his comments, but still just in these brief comments, it surely sounds like he would be leaps and bounds better than Ginni.

https://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/news/2019/09/20/if-red-hats-jim-whitehurst-ever-became-ibms-ceo.html

By David Purtell – Digital Producer, Triangle Business Journal
Sep 20, 2019, 2:28pm EDT Updated Sep 20, 2019, 7:50pm EDT

The man at the top of one of the Raleigh-Durham area's largest tech companies shared his thoughts on how business leaders can open up their companies to creativity.

Speaking at the annual meeting of the Greater Raleigh Chamber of Commerce, Red Hat CEO Jim Whitehurst spent most of his time on stage talking about establishing a management tone and a company culture.

Just two months removed from the closing of IBM’s (NYSE: IBM) $34 billion dollar buyout of Red Hat, Whitehurst talked about leadership in the digital age, and began with the concept of how disruption is affecting the business environment.

“Are you planning for that in your strategy?” Whitehurst said, referencing a story from a recent board meeting of a large health care company. “I realized it’s not only a fair question; in many ways it is one of the most important fundamental questions that we all need to ask ourselves.”

Following the merger, Whitehurst joined the IBM senior management team reporting to Big Blue CEO Ginni Rometty. Many in the tech industry believe Whitehurst could be one of the candidates to be up for the CEO's job in the future.

Whitehurst said too many CEOs today are using leadership skills from the previous generation — skills and models that aren’t able to keep up in the modern business world.

What happens in a world where business plans are potentially out of date within weeks or months, Whitehurst asked. “I can't tell you how many CEOs I talk to who sit there and complain, 'My culture is just not innovative,'” Whitehurst said.

"... Culture is an output of your management system and your leadership style; the messages you are sending," Whitehurst said is his reply.

“If you want a different level of agility, you have to fundamentally change how you operate," he said.

It’s not necessarily about the amount of work needed to be done, he said, it’s about the creative ability allowed to handle the work.

Allow your employees to experiment, and don’t focus too heavily on predicating the future. “I have no idea what’s going to happen in six months,” he said.

Talking about how a company can capitalize on new innovation, Whitehurst said nobody is good at identifying what new innovation is going to make a large impact — it’s about being able to figure out a way to get on board when something new does begin to grow in the marketplace.

“I would argue that if you look at great companies, starting off with motivation is important,” he said about how executives should understand what drives their employees. “My job is to create the context for my people to do their best work,” he said.

Hire smart people and provide them with the right training, and they'll figure out the best way to do the job, he said

"That’s how you enable people to be successful: give them the right tools and give them the ability to try new things, and make sure that the consequences are set up appropriately for that to happen," Whitehurst said.

by
| 2248 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+119CbEud

8 replies (most recent on top)

Unfortunately, Jim is unaware of top down mgmt within RH inside CEE. VPs & managers hired over the last five years from Docker, Net App, EMC, Cisco, HP, etc., that do not believe in meritocracy. Because of the merger, they now can re-org themselves into positions of power, promote their friends, & ignore input from technical managers. The talent & innovation that created & supported Openshift is being forced out. Jim's right. It's innovation over efficiency.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1Zlzt+119CbEud

Red Hat is the future. Wherever IBM and Red Hat have similar products, the IBM products (and people) will be dropped and the superior Red Hat products will be kept.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4mfp+119CbEud

Hire smart people and provide them with the right training, and they'll figure out the best way to do the job, he said
not the sh– video on line training IBM give - very basic

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4gab+119CbEud

It would be easier to move the profitable work to Redhat. Now you are catching on. IBM bought a strategy and is now executing it

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cfg+119CbEud

It would take 5 years to change the top down culture of IBM to be more like Red Hat bottom up culture. It would be easier to just slowly move the profitable work to Red Hat

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mnc+119CbEud

“I have no idea what’s going to happen in six months,”
is the same myopic vision that plagues the current leadership at IBM.
Sounds like he will fit in just fine.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mtd+119CbEud

So Whitehurst is saying IBM has been run precisely the wrong way for years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xhj+119CbEud

Whitehurst should become the CEO of IBM, he will get a chance to fix the jacked up price IBM paid for RHT, which he created as CEO of RHT.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dca+119CbEud

Post a reply

: