Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

CliffsNotes version of where Cisco is as a company...

This is the real skinny from a current shareholder, and former insider.

The well intentioned, Bumbling CEO: CR is a non-technical person lacking the presence and passion to inspire customers and employees alike.

His only roles within the company were in the partner teams and sales channels teams, and he’s had little-to-no exposure to the other important parts of the machine. This blissful ignorance fuels his c—eyed ideas that a partner led engagement model will lead Cisco to new growth. The reality is, that model is largely only good for order fulfillment.

The CTO: Oh wait... there is no official CTO. This is a pretty big red flag for tech company. While some execs double as character actors for customer meetings, playing this role for an hour or 2, it’s troublesome that the role doesn’t exist.

The Sales and Marketing leader: She’s got a VERY short list of successes on her CV, and while she can definitely inspire a crowd of pie-eyed millennials in a venue like Vegas, there is very little strategy to be seen on the sales side in the 13 months she’s been at the helm. In fact, many customers have cited their Cisco relationship as far less intimate since the regime change.

Internally, the sales teams have been capped and re-goaled, essentially taking pay cuts, and left wondering how those mandatory re-occurring licensing deals won’t screw them in the short and long term.

From a marketing standpoint things aren’t much better. She’s canceled funding for many major trade shows, customer events, and (shockingly) she’s called strategic marketing partnerships with major sports leagues, teams, media companies, etc.

The Message: While the company tries to woo wall street with promises of “Pivoting to Software” the reality is, they continue to buy hardware companies in an attempt to fortify their dwindling infrastructure business. Multiple optical manufacturing acquisitions in recent history hardly signal “Software Company” to anyone.

And speaking of software - Cisco has always s—ed at it in a major way. So they are depending on the newly acquired companies to help “re-invent” the image as a SW business. Only one problem, Cisco has failed to integrate these companies into its corporate fabric. They still largely operate as small immature businesses. And without a true CTO, the company lacks both a vision and a plan to create end-to-and solutions out of the newly acquired companies.

Re-occurring revenue: The street got excited when Cisco reported its first “re-occurring revenue” deals (multi-year ELAs). But now there is evidence that very little growth will come out of shifting Cisco’s licensing models. Most customers would rather not be forced to re-up for support or software on an infrastructure they’ve already booked as a capitol expense. And for those looking to move to an opex model, the cloud seems to be the preferred route. Which customers would prefer to engage with Cisco in this fashion is still largely unclear.

Perhaps the greatest CFO in the Biz: in spite of all of the broken pieces, Cisco’s CFO continues to expertly craft melodic tunes that hit all of the right notes with analysts and shareholders. But how much longer will it last? This is uncertain.

by
| 2997 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+11c84Nd4

10 replies (most recent on top)

I had to endure listening to the CMO GE when I was a Juniper. When you boiled it down she didn't really say anything. Just lots of buzzwords and arm waving. She got brought in by the leadership team that came from Microsoft and was promising to turn Juniper into a software company. We all know how that went. Juniper now calls the themselves a pure play router company and still talks about ASICs. Cisco's attempt to transform will turn out the same. Hardware is all that Cisco knows.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @roec+11c84Nd4

The “greatest CFO in the biz” wrote this ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rsoy+11c84Nd4

Normally I remain skeptical for most posts here. I have to say this summary hits rather close to home and I see many of the same things in my role.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8zuw+11c84Nd4

*But there is a CTO : Dave Ward. He’s the Engineering CTO and the last time I looked we were an engineering organization
by DontWorryBeHappy *

The last time you looked was apparently around 2004.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5bzu+11c84Nd4

"No unified licensing model (nor tool) exist. "

That's because Cisco is an M&A Franken-company made up of parts of acquisitions duct-taped together.

There is no 'One Cisco'.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4whz+11c84Nd4

But there is a CTO : Dave Ward. He’s the Engineering CTO and the last time I looked we were an engineering organization

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3mdw+11c84Nd4

which sf id-ts?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tuy+11c84Nd4

yada yada yada............

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oom+11c84Nd4

Great summation

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ukn+11c84Nd4

Speaking of licensing, don’t forget that no 2 products in the company’s vast portfolio have the same licensing Model.

No unified licensing model (nor tool) exist.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wui+11c84Nd4

Post a reply

: