Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM’s new CEO takes over today — here’s his plan

Can Krishna’s leadership set IBM’s stock price on a new trajectory, and return it to its historical
perch atop the enterprise tech mountain? That probably depends on two things.

One: Can he make IBM a consistent top-line grower? Because IBM has been around for more than
a century, it has a lot of old, profitable businesses like mainframes that are big and essential but
not growing. They’re great for cash flow, but not for the stock price. How do you keep them
around to fuel the future, but prevent them from defining the company?

Two: Can he solve IBM’s workforce conundrum? IBM had a massive payroll of more than 350,000
full-time employees as of the end of 2019. That’s 2.5 times as many as Apple and 3.5 times as
many as Google. Many of them work in IBM’s services business, doing the kind of nuts-and-bolts
software work customers need to prepare for the move to the cloud. How much does IBM invest
in that business, considering it isn’t growing and that cloud-driven trends threaten to shrink it?

Pay attention to #2.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/06/arvind-krishna-takes-over-as-ibm-ceo.html

by
| 2790 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+14lSpbzM

8 replies (most recent on top)

Give it another 5 years and IBM will only be a Mainframe company. This is my prediction... I am taking bets...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ftb+14lSpbzM

What is so special about RH OpenShift that you cannot get with just downloading and deploying the open source Kubernetes or any of the other thousand open source projects out there?

IBM decided 5+ years ago to stop developing software because today software is built by open source communities for free. IBM just package it and resell it for a profit. Unfortunately, there are still too many stupid customers who are willing to pay for that!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3xyy+14lSpbzM

RH OpenShift is interesting technology but there's no way it can be the centerpiece of a $77 billion company's market strategy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ohf+14lSpbzM

He has no plan! It’s very apparent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hzs+14lSpbzM

Actually the CNBC article nets it out nicely. The results of the Sam and Ginni show are in, and they say 75% of 350k has been off shored to low cost countries. Sam started this process when he was CEO and Ginni doubled down on it. It shows that skills and strategy were second class citizens to low cost. IBM saved their way to prosperity at the expense of innovation. Those chickens have now come home to roost, and Krishna has to deal with it. The low cost/replacement cycle has most likely run its course as there is no one left to replace. So what is the Krishna era strategy. I would bet on a shrinking of IBM to what it knows best. Enterprise/Mainframe and how to keep that proprietary HW/SW on the fortune 1000 floor for the foreseeable future. Everything else is a commodity, and IBM plays quite poorly in commodity marketplaces.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fyg+14lSpbzM

Real weak CNBC article IMO.

1 - A "massive payroll of 350,000". 75% of which is in India, China, Latin America and Eastern Europe.

2- Both Apple and Google have more United States based employees than IBM, and each year the gap widens.

3- IBM services is focused on Cloud - Journey To Cloud, Hybrid Cloud, Public Cloud, Multi Cloud, Cloud Paks with Redhat etc.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zgb+14lSpbzM

You cannot get young mainframe experts., You cannot get cheap mainframe experts. You cannot send mainframe expert jobs to the latest trendy outsourcing country. If you want to keep your mainframe business you better hang on to the few experienced people you have left.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1svx+14lSpbzM

Legacy outsourcing contracts and Mainframe are the only things that are going to keep IBM afloat during this crisis. Jettisoning them in favor of commodity cloud services in an already saturated market is id–tic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rry+14lSpbzM

Post a reply

: