Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Chief Human Resources Officer - Confirms Discrimination and is Tone Deaf

Rhonda Morris - Discrimination E-mail

"Selection Slates - As with selection teams, we are striving to have diverse selection slates and will implement a process to review slates that are not visibly diverse."

This is proof that Chevron will discriminate when creating selection slates, before not discriminating to pick the "best" candidate. There is nowhere to go to see what the process is, because I'm sure that it is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

Rhonda Morris - Tone Deaf Father's Day Workplace Post

This is a small excerpt. We all miss loved ones that have passed, but writing this while we are going through layoffs is exceptionally tone deaf.

"Our life was good, not perfect. My father lost his primary job when I was in high school and became depressed. This happened when getting laid off was unusual and depression was not discussed. He loved his job and never really recovered. Watching the job loss impact on my father taught me that my job is what I do, it is not who I am."

How many people that provide for their families are going to be gone in the next couple of months? Thousands. Not just fathers, but mothers as well. Many of the people that get laid off will be in a similar boat to her father. Just a few years ago, Chevron used to be one of those companies where you could work a full career. Not anymore. Nice work executives.

This is the Chief Human Resources Officer of Chevron. Letting us know that Chevron discriminates, and that you shouldn't be sad about losing your job.

by
| 5362 views | | 13 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+15Bw4naE

13 replies (most recent on top)

Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nfzp+15Bw4naE

RM is a poster child for what happens when you promote people based on quotas, not talent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gcqj+15Bw4naE

I'm no longer an employee but I am a stockholder. I don't believe for a second that this woke movement will enhance the ability to put barrels in the pipe so I'm looking for a permanent exit point for my stock. Goodbye CVX.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eqeu+15Bw4naE

In response to question about women advancing in company she just said you have to look outside because everyone there are no role models for her to see inside. Hugged her external role model. All her “board of directors” were men. Wow, I am bummed out by that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3gmb+15Bw4naE

Discrimination in the form of disparate impact during the RIF should be avoided if possible but its appearance may yet occur. That does not make the RIF action illegal. There may be a business continuity or succession-planning reason for example. If disparate impact occurs or appears to occur, it must be substantiated if challenged. CHRO is merely stating that the company is making a good-faith effort to promote diversity and avoid discrimination in the selection process- whether direct or indirect. It would be foolish to make RIF selections based solely on diversity issues and it would be equally foolish to not consider diversity issues at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2kvz+15Bw4naE

They won't because they are keyboard cowards who only act tough behind the safety of their PC.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2dcp+15Bw4naE

any of you plan to ask her about this at her livestream today?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ezc+15Bw4naE

@jho Chevron has never been a meritocracy .. How many people get jobs because they talked to the job owner or their "mentor" talked to the PDR or job owner? What of those "leaders" picked and placed in new jobs that were never advertised?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hak+15Bw4naE

At least, she writes well! Grow up, people. What is going on is not unique to Chevron.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jgr+15Bw4naE

All this focus on diversity is not helping the minorities and women that will be selected. Everyone will always assume they got their position due to their race / gender. Hire the best person period. Should not consider identity at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ynk+15Bw4naE

@vro. It means that someone qualified is being removed from the stale in favor of another diverse person who otherwise wouldn't have made the cut. if the isn't discrimination, then I don't know what it is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qzr+15Bw4naE

Chevron is not a meritocracy anymore.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jho+15Bw4naE

I’m ok with the requirement for the slate to be diverse as diversity doesn’t come into the selection.
It usually means one female / other diversity factor out of ten on the slate , if they can find one.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vro+15Bw4naE

Post a reply

: