Thread regarding Fiserv Inc. layoffs

Rethinking work from work? I’m hopeful today

It sounds like there will be some rethinking of the stringent no-WFH trend that was starting to roll out earlier in the year. I have on good authority that FB and the leadership team are taking a different tact here than before.

I hope SLT listen to and take into acount the perspectives of WFH associates as they make those decisions. No, they can’t make everyone happy, but they will see a lot of attrition, not all of it “our friend,” if suddenly people have to spend 2-3 hours each day commuting to keep their job. That, I think, is the real k–ler here — dropping that on people who never signed on for a lengthy commute.

And PLEASE consider regular traffic here. Mile radius is not the way to evaluate things. It’s easy to estimate actual commute times with high accuracy with free tools.

Commuting is, I’m convinced, the number one driver of general disengagement at work. It’s wasted time if it gets much past 30 minuts. I’d be looking immidiately.

If anyone with a seat at that table is listening: find a middle ground. Have people come in 1-2x a week but don’t jump daily office presence on folks because daily office presence. Especially post-COVID.

It’s not worth it; there is a better play here that bridges both philosophies.

by
| 1530 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+15Et7NJa

5 replies (most recent on top)

Look at this recent Dilbert. Has FB all over it.

https://dilbert.com/strip/2020-07-05?utm_source=dilbert.com/newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=brand-loyalty&utm_content=strip-image

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @anjl+15Et7NJa

Just a couple of observations that aren't aimed at any particular company.

Business, as a whole, is undergoing the largest experiment ever regarding WFH and it's simply inarguable that good, solid employees across the board are just as productive at home as they would be in the office, possibly even moreso. Arguing the opposite simply won't fly any more, especially not to employees, who are the ones putting in the extra hours and being more productive.

The best solution would be to offer a smaller environment for the subset of workers who enjoy (or need) the physical aspect. Additionally, offer a set of "hotel" cubes that can be reserved for the occasional physical visit. If this would result in an office that would be so small as to be cost-ineffective, shut it down and declare that all affected employees are now work from home.

Would some employees leave? Perhaps, but I'd be willing to bet a chunk of cash that fewer employees would leave if they're told their job is now 100% WFH than those would leave if they're told they need to move to a new city and commute an office.

One last point. In the unfortunate situation where it appears an employee doesn't do well at home, management should deal with it at the employee level. Too often it appears management (again, not specific to any company) doesn't want to deal with that mess, so they simply pull the whole concept.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xyt+15Et7NJa

We are not going back to the office anytime soon. We will all be work from home for quite awhile. Looks like Jan 1 isn’t out of the question, covid rates up in most all cities we have a large presence.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hot+15Et7NJa

I'd be happy coming in to office twice a week, I do not need to be in any more than that. I hope this is the direction they're headed. This is more forward thinking than just now allowing WFH... a lot of teams have proven they are more than efficient at home.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lma+15Et7NJa

Perfect advice!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ahn+15Et7NJa

Post a reply

: