Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM will Cost Cut itself to an Early Grave

IBM is now fully embarked on a desperate mission to cost cut itself to success. Since it cannot grow revenue due to too many declining legacy businesses, the COVID-19 economic crisis, and difficulties competing in the emerging cloud business, IBM must keep doing everything it can to cut costs to keep the earnings per share at an acceptable level. This is a one-way ticket to an early grave. As they cut higher quality people and replace them with lesser quality, the services IBM delivers will suffer and the customers will have even more reason to leave for another cloud provider once their strategic outsourcing or other service contracts expire. As IBM cut costs, it's reputation will continue to decline.

It is a death spiral that can only be halted by business growth. But where will this growth come from? Red Hat is too small to impact the IBM top line in any meaningful way. Cloud is a losing battle as the top 3 cloud services providers (AWS, Azure and Google Cloud) have been chosen by the marketplace already and Oracle looks like they are destined to be the # 4 player in the cloud. TSS is going to have increasing difficulty growing the business as hardware maintenance declines as hardware morphs into software on a server or moves to the public cloud. So there seem to be no options for IBM to re-ignite growth.

It is a nightmarish situation that IBM finds itself in. And one must wonder if IBM is doomed. They can lock-in and leverage the mainframe business to stay afloat but this is such a legacy move. Maybe becoming Big Brother with AI could be one way for IBM to survive. Hence, IBM must keep cost cutting until there is nothing left to cut and there is nothing left to move to India. Then what do they do.

by
| 2291 views | | 4 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+15I3c7Es

4 replies (most recent on top)

Typical IBM. All that matters is earnings per share this quarter. Worry about next quarter later. Worry about long-term sustainability..... never, There are three groups to care about: customers, employees and shareholders. Why does IBM always insist on only caring about one and letting the other two rot? Maybe because IBM execs are in that group themselves and only care about their own pocket.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4ahm+15I3c7Es

IBM is the equivalent of dead man walking. No strategy, no leadership and trying to save their way to prosperity. Look at their cloud outages? How does that happen? The smart execs are fleeing like rats. Like me. Horrible place to work and not a long term option for most folks. Good riddance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wmv+15I3c7Es

To be fair to IBM, clients are pushing us to use off shore resources. I am working with a large Banking client of IBMs in London and on every proposal we are submitting the client is pushing us to use off shore rather than UK based resources. There is a big drive across all clients to reduce costs and that impacts us and our delivery approach. So its not all black and white since the PS business is changing now and client wants the same services for less.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1avm+15I3c7Es

Well said. Do you know how they did on the second quarter?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1abl+15I3c7Es

Post a reply

: