Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

It’s NOT rocket science, it’s just business...

I know this post will probably be unpopular but let’s make a few things extremely clear....

First, this “Performance Based Reduction” IS a lay-off. The performance described in the majority of the feedback was suggested by HR to be “Communication and Relationship Building Issues”. These factors make it where if you take a PIP and the headcount number still is not met the supervisor can just relieve you of duty.

Also, if some of these posts look strange or have a hint of aggressiveness in them the answer is “Yes”. Yes, those are current XOM personnel defending their decisions, trolling, or just taking pleasure in your misfortune. Your opinions over the bad or good decisions making does not matter to them, they do not care what you can pay for, they don’t care about your health, family, or well-being because they have a job and you don’t.

Additionally , your performance, this year or last year, was subsequently eliminated from consideration out when the new system was announced. This lay-off is dictated by two factors your pay and your popularity. That is always how it is when the final decision is left to the supervisors. They will pick friends over the best workers on many occasions it is just because they are human or watching out for their own personal interests.

Finally, HR stayed out of this lay-off. Other than processing your outgoing paper work or accepting the PIP your supervisor attempted to write after you chose the PIP HR has complete deniability that they knew what was happening. HR is not designed to help you, it is designed to help Exxon. Since you are not a member of Exxon any longer, or on thin ice, THEY WILL NOT HELP YOU.

Unfortunately, the oil and gas market is merciless this year but companies may start turning it around, if they are honest and gain more investor/market confidence. Get your resume out there and get back in the workforce. I wish everyone the best and much more success than your experience in the “performance reduction” process

by
| 2672 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+161H07vm

5 replies (most recent on top)

I don't think folks in general have a problem with lay offs as people understand the current market environment. What's slimy is the whole way they're going about doing it, disgusting it as performance related. If you're letting people at least be upfront about it. Might not be what people wanna hear but at least they'll respect you for it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kyu+161H07vm

Agree your post is hard to take, but I think you hit the nail on the head. I've been PIP'd, and not because there was any technical problems. Had to do with, in their words, more or less being too "aggressive." What does this really mean? Boss probably didn't like me, and ended up going with what's comfortable, and what they like. I'll probably do the PIP as I need to stay busy, but you can bet I'm not taking chances hoping to get out of it. Plus, you think this year is bad? The bloodbath is just beginning. EM is going to clean house over the next few years, and sadly it will be of many quality / hard workers. The future does not look bright for them. I sure hope prospective new hires take note of how they are treating their current employees. It's disgraceful to disguise a lay-off like this, which gets EM out of paying unemployment after they separate with the employee on PIP or taking the 3 month package.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @chg+161H07vm

A new hire always has much higher possibility to get career advancement compared to an experienced hire( Phd is an exception). We all know it s called Potential but it is actually age discrimination. I have seen many young folks who didn’t show their technical competency at all on several short term engineering positions but get moved up higher

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @auy+161H07vm

I think it s an ugly truth

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ljr+161H07vm

This sounds like my situation. Me: less than two year on the job, experienced hire in a role that is also done by new hires (so my salary is larger than it “needs” to be), very little networking skills. My manager’s assessment of me was dropped by two levels once senior committee input was applied. I was told that I had no other supportive voices in the room because I hadn’t networked or made allies. No kidding. I’ve been with the company just over a year and this was my first evaluation. I’m assuming my chances of surviving a PIP are slim to none, for the reasons described above: low seniority, high pay, no connections.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fps+161H07vm

Post a reply

: