Thread regarding Thomson Reuters layoffs

The problem lies with greedy shareholders and a clueless management

There's more and more panic because they have RIF'd so many of the employees who actually generate product and services that generate income, that it is having an effect. They were looking for a quick fix by cutting costs, ie RIF'ing employees and then farming out their work to countries with cheaper labor costs. Sitting at their managerial desks, this would have sounded like a great way for the company to make lots of money. Don't forget too, that many of these managers were allegedly offered bonuses to RIF employees. Sure it has a quick short term gain, but then problems arise like that cheap source of labour doesn't have a clue what to do. Also, TR has never been good at documenting procedures so that hasn't helped outsourcing. You can't expect them to generate high quality product/services without them knowing what to do. You also have another issue with outsourcing in that these workers are continually looking for higher wages, so if they can get a better offer down the road, they're going to take it. And who can blame them. The problem then is finding cheap labor that wants to stick around and do a good job for TR. Then TR has the problem of being stuck with so many managers, many of whom are very ineffective and on high salaries, who don't actually generate any product/services. What do you do with them? Lay some more off for that quick fix to keep shareholders happy. Problem is options for doing this among the lower level employees who actually produce things to sell, are now very limited. So you now have to look amongst the managerial level. They're looking at each other and deciding who to throw under the bus next. The problem lies with greedy shareholders and a clueless management with an extremely limited vision/outlook.

Perfectly stated, @Ibcf+166J5prD. This needed to be on top!

by
| 1782 views | | 3 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+16PEEkhX

3 replies (most recent on top)

Also posted in another thread: EY is being brought on to analyze the effectiveness of demand gen marketing as a whole? There was an email that went out today. "One of the ways we’re trying to balance scale, efficiency and career for TR’s marketing profession is to look at how we resource our demand generation function . . . EY has been commissioned to do a discovery across all segments and regions to come up with a recommendation on how to best accomplish the above from an organization, process and measurement pov. After their discovery and recos are done, we will evaluate how to proceed in executing those recommendations."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3uqb+16PEEkhX

Well said. I saw many good people shown the door In those years simply because their manager didn’t like them; saw them as a threat or they had the gumption to stand up to them. There won’t be any cleaning house. Managerial favoritism and incompetency is too entrenched, and I doubt whether those in charge are going to do anything that puts them at risk. No, there will be more mood elevator c-ap, looking the other way and letting the rot continue.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1szf+16PEEkhX

If I were the new senior management I would ask each and every senior segment leader to go back to their plans for 2019 and 2020 and run through them, the projections, decisions made as a result and review them against results. I think we are very good at planning, but there is never any talk about results against those plans. It would be an eye opening exercise. I know for a fact that many people were unduly terminated, not because they were under performing, but they weren't in the right office or their senior manager didn't like them, which goes against the TR values. If the company wants to regain it's credibility they should clean house and get rid of these leaders who make decisions in their best interests not the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nfe+16PEEkhX

Post a reply

: