Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Chevron success is based mostly on quality of its assets and then on delivering value from those assets.

Asset portfolio is determined by our execs. Value efficiency is determined by our execs. If Chevron has declined in value generation over the last decade then the problem is not lack of leadership, effort or skills at the front line level, But it is somewhere else. Hhmm, where could that be? Where do the longterm execs think the problem is?

by
| 1895 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+16tsXhYn

5 replies (most recent on top)

I know that TCO FGP is largely untouched by transformation. I saw that a lot of positions are out of scope for Round 3.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @usn+16tsXhYn

Execs run the show, but front line folks take the blow.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sbd+16tsXhYn

Commodity prices and future price forecasts are a major contributor.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jch+16tsXhYn

Is Tengiz MCP going to be heavily cut during this transformation?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @syn+16tsXhYn

The more recent problem is big project capital overspend. Gorgon/Wheatstone and Tengiz FGP have not been CVX's proudest moments.

The Atlas acquisition gets a "pass" in comparison with XOM's XTO (or is that "uh oh") purchase. The Anadarko deal might be the best deal that we never completed.

Project execution seems to be the trouble spot in recent years

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fdk+16tsXhYn

Post a reply

: