Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

What company could you start with $160 Billion, and profit Vs . AT&T?

DId AT&T got it right?
Or was a bad idea from the start, if so why would you pay for MBA'S, paying Morgan Stanley analyst .Etc?

by
| 821 views | | 3 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+17woRiQK

3 replies (most recent on top)

At&the looks like a hybrid PONZI Scheme, takes money from edge fund investors to pay dividends back, as stock decreases in value, dividend goes up, and profits contracts l, in other wirds the whole AT&T business is a front to wash money,

Not existent ....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zao+17woRiQK

AT&T Chief Stankey winning about the Tech giants.

Tech Is Not the problem. like the tech Giants Hold Too Much Power Over Streaming,

the AT&T problem? Terrible UNDERDOG, and terrible loser, copycat of products, unoriginal in everything they do

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uda+17woRiQK

I think you miss the point of ATT.

ATT is not run for the benefit of the shareholders.
ATT is not run for the benefit of the customers.

ATT is solely run to allow Ratty, Stinky and the Board of Misdirectors to line their pockets and serve their egos till they cannot squeeze anything else out of it.

On the way out, Ratty and Stinky figure they may as well squeeze out some SJ $hit too, so they can go to the c—tail parties and hold their heads up high!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ikp+17woRiQK

Post a reply

: