WW3 is on a fast track. Do you guys think Stankey will listen and cancel WW3 or continue to bleed money ? This will be interesting to watch as this will show how detached C-siute is to reality.
12 replies (most recent on top)
Stanky has been running the show at Warner the last 1 1/2 years...it’s all Stankavision in regards to WW84! Don’t blame Warner Brothers for the disgrace ATT has created!
WW84 was a bad movie. My husband is a huge DC fan and was looking forward to watching this movie. In the middle of it, he paused it and went out to his shop. To date, he still hasn't watched the rest of it. When I asked if he was going to finish it, he said nope. Apparently the movie just didn't live up to all the hype.
The first Wonder Woman was far superior in every way. I find it difficult to believe Pedro Pascal ( who I like a lot) could not have been cast into another character / villain type role
I’m not on that side of the business but hoping for WarnerMedia’s success because I know that without it there won’t be money to invest in the other businesses. Sure, our leaders made some unusually bad business decisions (far too many acquisitions in the Stephenson era, for example), but if you are on my team, I want you to succeed. If not, we all fail.
Most people I asked liked it (even if they did not love it). The fact is, these superhero movies make money. They usually make money in the theater alone, including international. This one will likely just make it even with COVID. Then they become useful draws for HBO Max and HBO if not available elsewhere. Then, there is the licensing fees available elsewhere as the titles get older. And they drive interest in follow up titles and superhero television series. So, as long as we bring in actual revenue, I’m not going to be a critic.
Thank goodness that impartial, industry reviews differ from those of the posters on this board. Fast track Aquaman 2 as well. These movies make money b
All new movies over the past 6 months have been poor as far as plot, acting, pace of action, etc. WW 1984 is no exception- long, moved slowly, poor/boring scenes, uninteresting story/plot . . . . WW3 being hurried to market doesn't bode well for T
I do wanted it to be good. But atlas, it was mediocre at best. Plot was poor, the fight scenes that did exist were not good and the movie kinda dragged.
Oh well. Hopefully they can course correct the ship.
Expect Stankey to plow more funds into the poorly executed sequel while our traditional communications infrastructure (remember what that is Stinkey?) continues to deteriorate. Oh, and lay off some more American workers too.
I wish we could've seen how this movie would've done if things were normal.
It's a bad movie.
AT&T brass is allowing those Warner id–ts to continue with little pocket universe stories with the DC IP so it's not surprising WW84 s—ed.
They need to hire someone who has read the comics and force directors to stick to the source material with an overarching plan to bring all the movies together like Kevin Feige did with Marvel Studios.
All licensed TV shows need to take place in the same world as the movies as well. Fans have no interest in Titans, Doom Patrol, or a Pattenson Batman that's going to be in a standalone world. That's how the MCU is so successful.
That movie stunk. Too long, no story, technical glitches throughout. Looks like we have managed to ruin another successful product.