Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Here's a fun fact...

Here's a fun fact (and I suspect shows what a loser I am :-)) Pat Gelsinger and I were colleagues at Intel in the early 80's. We both worked in what was called "MIPO" (Microprocessor Operation) but I was in Systems Validation and he was on the customer facing side with field engineering. My career went off through a variety of engineering roles, his went into management and up. When he joined EMC, I told him I had always thought he would have been Intel's CEO. He told me, "Hey, maybe I still will be :-)... That was like 10 years ago, and here he is.

There are a lot of things you can say about Silicon Valley, but one of the more interesting aspects of it for me has been how "small" it is in terms of people have an oversized impact. I have never been one of those people of course, just a part of the entourage. But it has been interesting to watch and learn from folks who are good (and bad) role models...

by
| 3890 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+18U1jA0A

10 replies (most recent on top)

Don't set your hopes too high on JK returning right away. Based on his tenure at the companies he's work in, he is a rolling stone... although he did two tours at AMD.

Don't think Pat will hire a new design head right away. He's got to wrap his head around TMG first. Then he'll need to hunker down and figure out the internal design landscape. Then come up with a vision, sell it, and then hire/promote to execute that vision.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1evc+18U1jA0A

Pat, your first act should be to bring back Jim Keller! If needed, buy the AI start up he is heading......

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bsg+18U1jA0A

I don't think it's a coincidence corp jet MR was ousted and his private TCSG empire destroyed before Pat came back.

No point in being CEO when all of your decisions have to go through a QCOM reject bungler to get done.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lsh+18U1jA0A

I've seen Pat talk before a number of times. He's technical and tells it like it is (aka JimK style). Love him or hate him i never felt like i was getting a b—s— line. I think this is a net win for the company. BK/BS.... yeah no thanks for me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hxj+18U1jA0A

Don't think PG would be persuaded b/c of $$$. He should be well off $$wise at VMW. More likely it is due to the changes in the BOD since PSO/BK's time. AB the ex chairman is now gone and I'm guessing played a part why PG left. AB who at one time was worshiped inside intel and since been vilified.

My guess is Omar Ishrak must have moved Heaven & Earth to convince PG. And if I were him, would have recruited Gordon Moore to talk to PG. Gordon still has a sizable stake in Intel and PG reveres Gordon as mentioned in the press release. Thank God he is still alive at 92!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aay+18U1jA0A

He literally sleeps like a few hours a day. Always working.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zbz+18U1jA0A

As far as I remember, Pat's name was not only brought up when BK was canned, but also when PSO retired. He was also considered Microsoft CEO candidate at one point.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hcn+18U1jA0A

Wasn't Pat's name circulated when BK was shown the door (before they could not find any other alternative...and settled on Bob). Bob was "never" the 1st choice...he was the backup because after months, they found no one. They must have really sweetened the deal for Pat to reconsider. It's all about comp/$$$$.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ioe+18U1jA0A

Keeping in context that I've not worked with him in (gulp, 30 years!) at Intel he was one of the folks who put problems into the whole picture. So a customer would say, this chip doesn't work, over at Systems Validation we would get hopefully enough information to re-create their problem on an Intel built board, and Pat's job (at the time) was to co-ordinate between us, design engineering, and marketing to figure out how to tell the customer to proceed.

The "actual" problem could be anything from the customer misinterpreting the datasheet (Marketing/Comms problem), to insufficient testing (Factory/Production problem), to chip function (Design Engineering problem). As a "new college grad", or NCG in the lexicon, I admired how he dug out details from various folks to get to the real problem. He always had ideas for things Systems Validation (SV) could do to maybe trigger the problem that made sense to me. He really embodied the philosophy of fixing the problem not fixing blame on some group.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @csi+18U1jA0A

Any thoughts on what made him special (either from your perspective or from those choosing to promote him)?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kqz+18U1jA0A

Post a reply

: