Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Some research I did - take a look

Apologies for the long post, but I think it's worth reading. We're all smart people here, so I thought it'd be a good idea to share a quick investigation & exercise I completed a few weeks ago. "We're all in this together", our management claims. While we have our own thoughts if they actually mean this or not, do their own wallets back up this claim?

If you hadn't already, I'd highly recommend every employee (in fact, every shareholder) of every public company read the company's proxy. Our's can be found below. In short, this document highlights Executive/Board Compensation vs. company performance, and discusses any conflict of interest that may exist. It's quite an enlightening document, so again, please check it out.

https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/-/media/Global/Files/investor-relations/annual-meeting-materials/proxy-materials/2020-Proxy-Statement.pdf

There's a couple things I'd like to highlight here regarding our director and executive leadership compensation:

We've heard time and time again that one of our most important financial goals is to preserve our dividend ($3.48/share in 2020), as a commitment to our shareholders. Let's not forget here - our executives, board of directors, and many leadership in our company are ALL shareholders. They're rewarded stock options every year, normally dependent on company performance. The proxy above highlights the # of shares our directors and executives own.

Let's start with our wonderful Board of Directors, who oversee the decisions our company makes and have a lot of the final say with our business. Page 27 of the statement highlights the # of shares our BOD own. Did the math, this total is 262,558 shares. Not too much, but a decent amount.

The more interesting data is on page 54, showing how many unvested restricted shares our executive leadership team owns. Combine this with the # of vested shares on page 27, we see that just our 5 executive leadership own about 4.1M shares of XOM. They'll claim that the shares are restricted, don't vest for a very long time, and therefore can't be cashed out. They're right, but one thing they won't mention, written amongst the print on page 53, is that they do receive dividend payments on restricted, unvested shares. That's a nice $14.3M in dividend divided up by just these 5 individuals. This doesn't count ANY of our other executives and high level employees that own stock but also receive a dividend, and finally, let's not forget Mr. Tillerson and his 2 million shares, earning him a nice $7M/year for helping us get into the mess the shareholders see we're in right now.

We love talking about how so many of our investors "depend on our dividend". Page 27 shows the largest shareholders of our company. Vanguard & BlackRock, two of the largest asset managers in the world, in total own over 15% of outstanding company shares. That's 636 MILLION shares of XOM stock, and $2.2B of XOM cash they're gonna be receiving this year from dividend. I'm sure these investors really need it. Oh and by the way, the CEO of BlackRock? Larry Fink. Some of you may remember his 2019 letter to the CEO's (https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/larry-fink-ceo-letter) describing the fundamental change required to shift away from investing in fossil fuel companies. Ha ha. We really love our shareholders unconditionally don't we Mr. Woods, more than our employees in fact! But we already knew that. Give money that we don't have to investors, and by the way these investors don't really like us anyway.

Our executives strive our "Pay for Performance" system, both to our shareholders and to us. In fact, PADP is strongly reinforced by them, and due to the business climate, they cut our 401k match, education reimbursement, and pay raises for the next few years (at least). If we're feeling the hit and losing our jobs, they should to. The $15M our board and executive team this year in JUST dividend payment is cash that's equivalent to 88 full time US employees (using a median 2019 employee pay of $173k) , these 88 employees amongst many more will learn of their layoffs this week.

XOM has been underperforming our competitors for a decade, and we've greatly suffered in 2020. The whole industry has, but even in the midst of COVID we're now a smaller company than Chevron by market cap. Wall Street is clearly not impressed by us (neither fiscally nor ESG-wise), but we continue to pay them and our own executives with handsome cash dividends. Cash that could have kept some benefits or saved some employees from being laid off, which are taking place because the company isn't performing and needs to be more cost competitive.

Darren & team, if we're really "all in this together", back it up with your wallet. Otherwise, drop the act. #cutthedividend

And to the rest of you that made it to the end, thanks for reading and hope you find it informative. I wholeheartedly wish nothing but the best for you and our true hardworking employees. I'm finding my fate out this week too, but I've come to terms with it and am ready to look forward if they let me go.

by
| 4713 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+18bNqhlB

12 replies (most recent on top)

@1pmf+18bNqhlB
Cutting the dividend that goes directly to ones personal bank account......would take much more than a $4 hike in stock price to be anywhere near equivalent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1djc+18bNqhlB

Another mindless rant. You should be thankful that Blackrock and other institutional investors still hold XOM stock or else the price would tank even lower, requiring further cuts in employees and benefits. These funds represent millions of investors across all income levels and demographics, and the XOM dividend makes up only a small part of their overall return. Many investors have already dumped XOM because of losses and a poor performance outlook. Be thankful for those that haven't yet.

As for the BOD and senior leadership hanging onto the dividend payments for personal gain, another ridiculous claim. If cutting or eliminating the dividend would increase the stock price by more than $4/sh– would be much more of benefit to them, so why not do it?. Bottom line, XOM has a lot of work to do in cutting expenses, right sizing the organization, and more efficiently directing capex spending rather than cutting the dividend. The market is forcing XOM management to take drastic steps that must be taken in this new industry outlook, so don't let them off the hook by letting them pocket the dividend and not doing what is necessary. XOM does not need the added cash flow for any legitimate reason now, and the company should load up on cheap debt.

Yes, management should pay for their mistakes, but much of what the Op says is just illogical feel good ranting which makes no financial sense. If cutting the dividend would "fix" XOM, the BOD would do it immediately. But, it won't. It is a step to be taken only after all other necessary measures have been implemented, and only then if cash flow is still unacceptably low. Anything else just keeps XOM in a non-competitive position for a longer period of time and delays the inevitable hard decisions to downsize people and assets. That is what is needed most now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pmf+18bNqhlB

To be honest, this information was already generally known. There have been a few other threads on this site that discussed the unjustifiably high dividend payments, the debt incurred by the company to pay those dividends, and the conflict of interest among the EM Board Members (and other high CL staff) who receive RSU's as part of their compensation package.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rbk+18bNqhlB

OP here: Hey everyone, wow I really appreciate the feedback. I was wondering whether or not it was worth posting last night but glad the post is doing well (don't think I've seen a +96 before), and I believe it's because we all believe that our leaders should be held accountable. It's borderline a conflict of interest that unfortunately goes generally accepted in our society. But in the end, this is all publicly available info and we as employees deserve to know it, especially when layoffs are taking place.

Responding to a few comments here, I don't believe it needs to be taken to the media, but if this inspires a reporter then hey go on ahead. Our leadership defends the dividend at every opportunity it gets (it's even on the FAQ in the goto/USprogram), so it's within our rights to question it.

Congrats to anyone that had their voluntary accepted, and good luck to everyone in the involuntary.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zff+18bNqhlB

I wonder why the post suggesting an SEC investigation was deleted when the new US President is inaugurated? Seems pretty clear there’s an incentive problem with senior executives here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sqi+18bNqhlB

One of the best posts on this forum

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @izv+18bNqhlB

They are going to say that grannie has the shares at vanguard but they can’t deny they shamelessly milk the dividend.
The full executive compensation and the priorities that follow our system of incentives has to be clear to everyone, especially investors and analysts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qyl+18bNqhlB

Great research, submit it to some newspaper. Maybe it can change things to something positive?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nzz+18bNqhlB

Great research, submit it to some newspaper. Maybe it can change things to something positive?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fkz+18bNqhlB

Very appropriate - very layoff relevant.
Thanks, OP.

The Blackrock exposure is new to me.
The rest - well, that's just royalty of the corporate kind.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xtc+18bNqhlB

Agree. It isn’t some old widow grandma’s divided they are worried about it is their own fat payout. Integrity? Right.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zwk+18bNqhlB

What a waste of time!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ara+18bNqhlB

Post a reply

: