Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Throw in the towel on Teams?

Now that SFDC is buying Slack, wonder if Cisco will bother anymore with this product.

by
| 4252 views | | 17 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+18biflYJ

17 replies (most recent on top)

Everyone seems to rave about Microsoft Teams

Literally no one I know that actually USES MS Teams "raves" about it. The best that I hear is, "it mostly works".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hsgl+18biflYJ

I don't know many people outside a few corporates who have even heard of WebEx let alone WebEx Teams. Everyone seems to rave about Microsoft Teams and to be honest if you have other MS products then it's a better choice. The other family favourite seems to be Zoom which has boomed this year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @asoq+18biflYJ

Still, as of one hour ago, it was Webex Teams when I searched for the app.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7oem+18biflYJ

It's not called Webex TEAMS anymore. Just Webex.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7igu+18biflYJ

With TCP sockets and some you could make your own WebEx.

Any companies that ditch WebEx and just use discord, for FREE?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5fkt+18biflYJ

Benioff used to be on the Board of Cisco. He knows too much about WebEx to acquire it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3jtj+18biflYJ

If Slack is worth $27 billion by itself, how much is the Collab BU worth (Webex, CUCM, Video, Teams)? I have to believe there was at least a conversation with Salesforce about buying it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3oii+18biflYJ

MS and Cisco copied Slack's interface.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3nll+18biflYJ

Did Cisco bother with this product anyway? They switched between so many messaging/collaboration apps internally, new leader, new clothes. Hey ho, another lump of billiion$ spunked on trying to keep up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ltr+18biflYJ

love google.meet.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2evg+18biflYJ

When I hear "Teams" I think of the "Microsoft Teams". It is stupid that Cisco named its product Teams.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2tbs+18biflYJ

Slack was never the competition. It’s zoom and Microsoft.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cjn+18biflYJ

Rowan didn’t start Project Squared — he just screwed it up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gvf+18biflYJ

It’s being spun off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xvt+18biflYJ

At Cisco, the model is bundle collaboration products with switches & routers. Are customers willing to eventually PAY for teams? Customer adoption is inconsequential if companies are not willing to pay for Teams.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @orl+18biflYJ

I'm not aware of a singe relevant customer using Teams. Has it been long enough to call Rowen's baby ugly despite the incredible amount of money spent?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xpi+18biflYJ

Customers have already adopted it (not many, but enough). That will prevent it from being canceled. Also, Webex has no other story vs. Zoom, so even if it is sh– and a failure, it is so invasively integrated into Webex that it can't be k–led.

At Cisco, the model is: infect customers or infect organizations. They succeeded in both.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zey+18biflYJ

Post a reply

: