Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

They are trying every which way possible to make experienced employees unhappy

Make no mistake while we lost 2 PTO days overall, compensation losses can be bigger if you are experienced.

The bigger loss may be the fact that TSR is now a much narrower band 80-120%. Suppose middle of a salary band is 100,000. 80% is 80,000 and 120% is 120,000. If you are experienced employee you are probably making OVER 100,000 and now may be close to your max for your band (where as before the band would have been around 140,000). You are also probably close to your old max because you have not received a promotion in years. So your merit raises as a experienced employee is now smaller. Even worse, if you are making above your new max(120%), you won't get even a lump sum during merit raise time. Essentially your salary is frozen if you are at your new max. For a younger employee they are bumped up from 60% of their range to 80% minimum. So better for younger or new workers. Beyond cruel.

Even more, they get rid of IPI for some strange "connection" award that is subjective and no one knows how to award it. You have to get nominated by your manager. So if your manager is passive and does not nominate you, you don't get even nominated for the new connection award. Of-course even if you get nominated you still have to get approved by your GM and may be your VP. Who knows who has the budget, I bet it is at VP level. HR didn't even say how the mechanics of that award work. And if you don't work on a hot visible project, then you also don't get nominated because they said award is for achievements on a project. Usually IPI was done by collaboration once a year by managers and managers peers for about 30% of employee base. All employees were considered based on their yearly performance. I guarantee this new way no one knows how the connection award is given unless you are buddy buddy with your supervisor.

They are pretty much trying to get rid of people with 20 years of experience. People who built this company.

by
| 2985 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+18mCWibo

8 replies (most recent on top)

The older employees of ATT, a lot of us started around 99. Some of us long before that. I moved to ATT from a different Fortune 500 corporation but things moved slowly there because of government contracts and oversight.
What kept me at ATT for so long was the people. We just simply got the job done. If something needed done, fixed, and/or an area was struggling we jumped in to solve it. We didn’t hear this isn’t your job, did you get a ticket, how are you tracking this time.
As time progressed it was about how to prove you were doing what the company had as objectives. If you had a CTW and it was resolved you became visible. If you worked 1000 tickets great, who was checking to make sure the customers was happy, if the person working the ticket didn’t? It was simply about numbers not stability.
It was less about empowering the employee to do the right thing the right way all the time. The minute this empowerment shifted is when the direction of the company was shifted. The older employees kept doing what the know how to in addition to taking on more and more tasks.
You welcome for maintaining a company so that a younger generation can try to pull it up by the bootstraps and fix it all.
Wishing you the very best, it looks like a rocky road.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4nvw+18mCWibo

You have to be more creative now to find ways to milk this cow without raising alarms to your boss. Run errands on work time, cut hours worked, handle personal business during the day, find side income and work it while on AT&T time, don't unnecessarily contribute to charities and organizations (like PAC) that T recommends/requests you to, take home office supplies you need for personal use, etc. The company doesn't care about you so don't worry about their needs if you can get away with it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4nts+18mCWibo

35 years with this company and I see it in “total desperation mode” trying to generate a revenue stream anywhere they can! The debt load that T is carrying is really hurting it’s image and stockholders are very wary of investing in T. I’ve never seen senior management scrambling like they’re doing now looking for the right solution or immediate answer to their dilemma. For years their answer has always been a “reduction in force” as a way to reduce cost. In this case T is too far behind the 8 ball and a RIF is merely a band-aid to a massive problem, too much debt! Don’t be surprised if T sells off far more than Crunchyroll as they already have and DTV in the works as well as other business units! It’s crisis mode...desperate times call for desperate measures!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gpm+18mCWibo

20 years and you built this company? You meant you kept this company going. Don’t disrespect the older people who really built this company. I’m 8 years in and I even know that!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2pml+18mCWibo

Twenty years!Thats a great accomplishment to commit to the same company for that long!Thank you for your selfish service for keeping the company progressing and growing into what it is today to pave the way for the next generation to keep it going !You do deserve more than just a pat on the back and a watch!I will be looking at 15 more years before retirement age and I do appreciate what the more experienced people have done for this company!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pxi+18mCWibo

thanks for your efforts don't forget to get your six month payout on your way out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lsc+18mCWibo

Exactly right!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ecf+18mCWibo

Astute observations, 100% correct.
It’s clear they are unwilling to make an offer of enhanced severance, or pension kicker, or any other tangible incentive to get older employees off payroll. They are going the other way, trying to take what they can slowly and deliberately in order to get these folks gone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wlw+18mCWibo

Post a reply

: