I did guess it was not possible. Who can do it ? The Op ? or the Admin of the site ? I hadn't the time to review some interesting comments (I'm wrong or they were regarding imminent RA actions) and moreover I would have been glad the chance to provide my contribution about some CEOs like Sam, his tenure and his legacy to Ginny.
Is there censorish also here as in blue ? If yes I can close with here. Thanks
The actual misogyny was in promoting a woman beyond her abilities simply because she was a woman. She was doomed to failure and made it very difficult for a future woman candidate who is actually qualified.
@hst - there was nothing remotely misogynistic about the OP. It's perfectly acceptable to be highly critical of our former CEO - a person who has a proven track record of failure and is a terrible human being. Being male or female doesn't change those facts either way.
Thanks to all of you who have answered (few but good). It is worthwhile for you to continue reading and participate with horror in the slaughter described in this place. Notwithstanding the imperant gag of the 'Politically correct" thought, remeber form someone also in the go woke go broke.
Sam (a historian, know - if I remember well) with is his Jams (sessions with the employees where were collected - or stolen, who knows - ideas) produced visions about the future World supported by IT. In which eventually to invest or to pursue in terms of research. That approach was substituted - or just depressed - by the we go there just there, no objections are allowed. At the cost of arrive there going with the car in reverse and descendent, with revenues falling and employees starvating.
Hence, he gave the scepter to her saying "she is ready". And she, like a good matron, those of ancient Rome, she immersed herself in the mission. Nobody was expecting her at home, apart from a husband engaged in financial speculation - who might even offer her some advice every now and then. So the norm became the autocracy and dictatorship of a handful of marketers who sniffing polls (inside and outside blue) brought out the oracle of where the world was going - we already know it, we were living it- , instead of where it could has been gone. So flattening the collective prophecies on mere horoscopes in which to precipitate with whipping and no rewards myriads of indolent but hopeful and honest workers.
During the path she thought, maybe, if I can't achieve the financial results and have all the employee happy maybe I can at least create some clones of me to perpetuate the try.Et voilà, the politically correct applied at a century old enteprise , to eliminate the obstacles or maybe just for a joke to the previous real owners Watson Jr and Sr. What do they disliked or have done ? Ok, we go to the opposite side. And if we can't ? Let Samson and all the Philistines die.
@yqs - well said.
The post right under yours' is a perfect example of the lunatics running the asylum , where the reader feels any criticism of a woman has to be 'slightly misogynistic'!
There is censorship happening everywhere, under the pretext of ‘hate speech’.
Every speech good or bad needs to be protected no matter what the context. It is up to the reader to make a judgement. That is a world where sane and adult minds make decisions.
Unfortunately the world is now being run by a bunch of kids and the grown up’s are just playing along.
While not disagreeing that Ginni was a spectacularly bad leader and I’m happy she’s going, the post seemed particularly over the top in its mean-spiritedness
and slightly misogynistic. Attack the person’s overall performance, not the person.