Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM Names Research Veteran as CIO

Hopefully Previn takes all his Agile B.S. with him.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ibm-names-research-veteran-as-cio-11614643140
Kathryn Guarini of IBM Research succeeds Fletcher Previn, who is leaving the company

International Business Machines Corp. named a new chief information officer, as the 109-year-old company works to revamp growth by focusing on artificial intelligence and hybrid-cloud computing.

Kathryn Guarini, a 20-plus year IBM veteran, replaces outgoing CIO Fletcher Previn, who is leaving to pursue other opportunities, the company said.

IBM declined to make Ms. Guarini, who most recently served as chief operations officer and vice president of impact science within IBM Research, available for an interview. Mr. Fletcher, who the company said will work with Ms. Guarini “over the coming weeks” on the transition, couldn’t be reached for comment.

“The IBM CIO role is one of the most challenging in the industry,” said Gartner Inc. vice president Chirag Dekate. As CIO, Ms. Guarini will oversee an information technology team of over 12,000 employees who are responsible for managing IT infrastructure used by more than 350,000 IBM workers around the world, he said.

Ms. Guarini’s other priorities will likely include harnessing those technologies IBM is focusing on for growth, he said.

Her appointment comes as IBM is trying to boost sales partly by focusing on AI and hybrid-cloud computing, in which companies use a combination of their own data centers and computing resources leased from others and accessed online.

IBM is betting it can assist companies in managing the complexities of such transitions, and help them take advantage of artificial intelligence.

Helping companies glean value from AI can be a tall order, depending on the industry. The Wall Street Journal reported last month that IBM is exploring the sale of its Watson Health unit, highlighting the challenges of building data sets that unlock the full value of AI in the healthcare sector.

Tim Crawford, of tech advisory firm Avoa, said as CIO, Ms. Guarini can help IBM engage with or better understand the needs of other CIOs. "Generally, the CIO role can be a strong advocate and conduit to engage other CIOs,” he said. “She could leverage these relationships to help ground IBM as addressing customers’ changing needs.”

Beginning in spring 2017, when he was named CIO, Mr. Previn prioritized user experience in the development of internal applications and systems, in an effort to attract and retain employees. Among other moves, Mr. Previn hired an executive reporting to him to oversee a team responsible for designing IT services while taking into account user research, workflow and metrics.

“Fletcher Previn established a strong foundation of improved internal tools, applications and IT infrastructure to improve productivity of IBMers,” Mr. Dekate of Gartner said. “He also helped IBM navigate Covid and the resultant effects on the workforce dynamics.”

Mr. Previn succeeded Jeff Smith, who helped institute a culture of agile software development during his tenure from 2014 to 2017.

Ms. Guarini has held various technical, management and executive positions since joining IBM in 1999, according to the company. Within IBM Research, she was responsible for projects related to the future of health, work, and climate, among other duties, according to the company.

by
| 3809 views | | 25 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+19Fce0Yw

25 replies (most recent on top)

Here's what the "Young Bucks" don't get.

When us "Old Geezers" were young we were told we had to get degrees in Comp Sci. to get to the Sr. positions and the $$$ rewards that went with it...

Then at some point the whole industry went "Cert Crazy"... I think it started with PeopleSoft... and went from there.

Then the industry turned things on it's head and started hiring new college grads for newer tech dev jobs and let the folks that paid the dues and paid for the degrees... become "obsolete"... so we never got the rewards we paid the dues for...

Makes sense, in a way... why move old geezer to new tech... and hire young geezer and make them learn the old ropes... then you'd have two folks on learning curves.

Certainly not fair if you believe "paying dues to move up" is a real and fair thing.

But seems to me this is the only industry that does this to people... Dr's., Laywers, MBA's etc. ... no other degreed profession does this.

Throw in that contracting companies somehow got into the mix and kneecapped career upward mobility... because the only want someone that's already done what the posting is for... and there's a problem... not to mention the money they parasitically siphon off.

Throw in "New Collar" (no collar? LOL!) and things like Project One Ten (is it?) and it completely devalues the lifetime of effort the old geezers paid. As well as the cost of degrees...

So Young Bucks may think this is all fine... heck when I was a young buck I didn't get the seniority thing at all...now that I've lived through it all... I definitely get it.

For many of us oldsters... we paid the dues, and the rewards were snatched away.

Hopefully the young geezers won't have this happen to them... but as they become the old geezers and their shiny new things become the legacy things...it very may well. As one poster wrote... "BOHICA", LOL!

I'd say, reality is... putting same effort into MD, JD or MBA would probably have been a better deal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8gtm+19Fce0Yw

"Dear old geezers, young buck here.
Jim and us Red Hats are going to be taking over, continuing the plan to bring in more innovative fresh taken Instead of you old timers afraid to try thing new and change, and push you out.
Keep the seats warm for my homies. Thx
Oh and keep complaining about technology and tools and “why can’t we just keep using what we have”. It makes it easy to decide who to cut. "

Son... you are an id–t, LOL!

Don't have enough experience yet, to know when a BOHICA moment is coming at you... fallen prey to every shiny thing sold at you...

Don't say the geezers didn't tell you... when you are an old "battle axe" and have to deal with the messes you made, LOL!

There's only two things old age can really offer to youth... Wealth and Experience... and well... you seem to want to ignore the second. Probably because the world has gone catywampus and is handing wealth to children, for bloated garbage-ware, it would seem.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8yjq+19Fce0Yw

"...Terrible reference from Stewart mate. That was from 2014. It's been majorly updated since then.
Try again dinosaurs. Yous probably think IBM should "eat it's own cooking". Hate to tell you, look at IBM revenue..... your cooking isn't doing well. ...

Can confirm... Butterfield's statement is as correct today as it was then, LOL!

Just google "Slack S—s"... it's not an uncommon sentiment...

That said... this industry has just been making bigger messes ever since real, old school engineers moved on to other things.

Each generation just seems to do a messier, more bloated reinvention of the same ol' wheels... when a plain ol' wheel was all that was needed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8agz+19Fce0Yw

Can confirm.
Notes was sold to HCL and they took full control July 2019. The two-year grace period deal will expire July 2021 so by then everyone will be on outlook.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8thm+19Fce0Yw

Maybe with the CIO, they can toilet that useless Lotus Notes program and move to Outlook.

I can hear the old legacies grumbling now. Please Red Hat, take over IBM as quickly as you can and bring your updated tools.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8urh+19Fce0Yw

Dear old geezers, young buck here.
Jim and us Red Hats are going to be taking over, continuing the plan to bring in more innovative fresh taken Instead of you old timers afraid to try thing new and change, and push you out.
Keep the seats warm for my homies. Thx
Oh and keep complaining about technology and tools and “why can’t we just keep using what we have”. It makes it easy to decide who to cut.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8pgt+19Fce0Yw

Terrible reference from Stewart mate. That was from 2014. It's been majorly updated since then.
Try again dinosaurs. Yous probably think IBM should "eat it's own cooking". Hate to tell you, look at IBM revenue..... your cooking isn't doing well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8lku+19Fce0Yw

What’s Better Than Slack? These Companies Have Some Ideas. –
By: Krithika Varagur
Updated March 7, 2021 8:54 pm ET

https://www.wsj.com/articles/whats-better-than-slack-these-companies-have-some-ideas-11615118401

When Becky Kane started interning at a productivity software company in 2014, she experienced a workplace rite of passage: drowning in Slack messages.

The company, Doist, had always been mostly remote, so Slack, the ubiquitous business communications platform, was the main way to connect with her new colleagues. Ms. Kane lives in Minneapolis, but Doist employees work around the world.

“I definitely have an addictive personality,” says Ms. Kane, 29. Slack, with its signature mix of round-the-clock banter, GIFs, updates about serious work projects and small talk, took over her life. “It was so tempting to be there all the time,” she says.

She transitioned from intern into full-time marketer in 2015, and the messages kept coming—until 2016. That’s when her company quit Slack. Her workday dramatically improved, she says. These days, she typically logs in to Doist’s internal message board in the morning to check for project updates, logs out, and writes and edits until lunch with few distractions.

Since Slack’s platform made its debut in 2013, it’s helped cement instant messaging as an essential part of white-collar work. But many beleaguered workers found that it replaced email, never a beloved technology itself, with something even more distracting.

Use of Slack and other collaboration platforms like Microsoft Teams and Facebook Workplace soared during the pandemic. From January to April 2020, the average time that Slack users were active on the platform jumped to about 120 minutes a day from about 85 minutes, according to its latest earnings report. (The Wall Street Journal is a Slack client.) Microsoft Teams found a 72% increase in instant messages in March 2020, compared with a baseline of January-February 2020.

Still, some companies are pushing back on the constant chat trend, by reducing, or even eliminating, the expectation to have any live chats and calls in the average workday. There are simply too many messages.

The buzzword for the new way to communicate in these workplaces is asynchronous. Asynchronous communication refers to chats that don’t happen in real time. It can include annotated documents, posting on message threads that don’t send notifications for every update, and, yes, good old-fashioned email. Synchronous communication refers to the rest: video calls, phone calls, chat apps and face-to-face conversation.

Doist, where Ms. Kane still works, has created an asynchronous-first culture after quitting Slack, says Gonçalo Silva, its Portugal-based chief technology officer. The company designed its own internal communication platform called Twist, which organizes discussion threads on specific projects or topics instead of creating catchall, rapid-fire channels.

Going a step further, the company ditched regular meetings, too. Any companywide talks are recorded and posted online.

Asynchronous teamwork also requires some individual changes. Ms. Kane has grown used to communicating deadlines well in advance. She rarely expects her 91 colleagues spread across 35 countries to be online at the same time.

Slack can be used asynchronously, in theory—say, if company culture accommodates slow response times—but that rarely happens in practice.

The median response time for Slack users in 2020 was 16.3 minutes, according to the productivity analytics firm Time is Ltd., which analyzed an anonymized data set of 5,000 users around the world for The Wall Street Journal. For emails, the median response time was 72 minutes.

Slack has a number of features to make notifications more manageable, notes Noah Weiss, the San Francisco company’s vice president of product. These include the option to be notified only if people tag your name and a do-not-disturb mode.

Slack’s key innovation over email, he says, is that users can actively opt into the channels most relevant to their work. He sees email, by contrast, as all kinds of information being pushed to workers. It’s hard to opt out of that, he says, barring measures like blocking senders.

A Microsoft spokesman also points to features that promote asynchronous work on Teams, including setting “quiet hours” and “quiet days” and getting virtual meetings recorded and transcribed.

As for the informal and social parts of Slack chats, from which many users find it especially hard to detach, Mr. Weiss says, “We’ve never [explicitly] focused on trying to enable better social uses of Slack, but we think it’s a good sign that we’ve built a tool for work that people feel makes the workplace more humane.”

Several companies have created their own platforms for asynchronous updates in recent years. Zapier, a company that lets users sync web applications, has Async. Stripe, the fintech company, has Home. These platforms need not displace Slack altogether, but they can take over some functions. Posting updates to company policies during the pandemic on a dedicated page, for instance, eliminates the need to constantly field HR questions in a high-traffic chat channel.

Whatever your messaging platform of choice, making your workplace asynchronous-first involves deliberate choices at every step, says John Meyer, CEO of Lemonly, an infographics design agency in Sioux Falls, S.D., with 17 employees in three U.S. time zones. When he decided to make his company more asynchronous a year ago, he directed his team to write things out instead of defaulting to meetings. He also became an acolyte of Loom, a screen-recording tool that lets you record your computer screen or short videos of yourself.

“That was great for the two members of my team who went on maternity leave during the pandemic. They just recorded videos about how to do their job for the workers who took their place,” he says.

Last summer, even Slack started developing an asynchronous video feature, still in pilot mode, Mr. Weiss says.

These developments aside, there are still obvious uses for real-time communication, such as personnel disputes, tense work emergencies and deadlines, not to mention hilarious observations with a short shelf life. It’s hard to imagine a company eliminating it altogether.

The key is to be thoughtful about chat boundaries, says Nir Eyal, the Singapore-based author of “Indistractable: How to Control Your Attention and Choose Your Life.”

He doesn’t view communication apps as inherently problematic, but thinks workers can be more deliberate about incorporating them into their workday. “I encourage putting everything on a calendar, not just meetings—even times in a day when you can check Slack,” he says.

“Group chat is like a hot tub,” he says. “You should get in and get out, not sit in it all day.”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7mnf+19Fce0Yw

For the two "mates" arguing about Slack below.. I'll just leave this here... it's what it's founder, Stewart Butterfield had to say about Slack... LOL!

"Oh, God, yeah. I try to instill this into the rest of the team but certainly I feel that what we have right now is just a giant piece of sh–. Like, it’s just terrible and we should be humiliated that we offer this to the public. Not everyone finds that motivational, though."

Who are we to argue with Stewart...? LOL!

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:bRk8YARAQ6EJ:https://www.businessinsider.com/stewart-butterfield-calls-slack-terrible-2014-11+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7qay+19Fce0Yw

"Mate, you’re exactly the type of IBM dinosaur they need to rid themselves of. You need to move on with technology, not hold on to the past. Jiminy Crickets "

And your the type of bozo that like change for changes sake...

The idea is to make things better... to remove "the s—"... improve efficiency, simplify complex things...

A c-appier chat isn't the answer to anything of value or any of those goals... when the older method is better... the new method needs to go in the bit bucket... newer better... and often just means buggier.

But then the entire "distrubuted generation" or whatever "not-dinosaurs" are called (millennials maybe)... are affected with that kind of counterproductive ADD.

The idea is to actually engineer solutions and let them to the work... not constantly churn and and disrupt productivity matey...

Anything with the word "manifesto" in it is a political document... and politics has no place in technology... and Slack... is the darling of the the "Manifesto" id–ts...

Agile is basically a return to reactive and not-engineering... again for the ADD crowd...

The non-dinosaurs have actually added zero in terms of new technology... and no... a new program is not new "technology"... it's just a use case for existing technology.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6urn+19Fce0Yw

“Sametime was better than that Slack BS “

Mate, you’re exactly the type of IBM dinosaur they need to rid themselves of. You need to move on with technology, not hold on to the past. Jiminy Crickets

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4bhk+19Fce0Yw

" ... got us off of Sametime, notes, ..."

Sametime was better than that Slack BS... darling of the Agile Cult folks... at least one could save the chats with Sametime. Slack is the biggest BS ever perpetrated, LOL! Folks use it as an excuse to not-engineer, and not do focused communication...

Converting Notes DB's to Box was a waste of time and another lost of functionality there... bulk search...

Change for the better is one thing... cramming tools meant for small dev teams ding-donging with Agile... quite another, LOL! Agile and it's tools are an excuse to not do engineering and go back to being reactive... but that's another long discussion, and no doubt one that would be heard as heresy by those who've been s—ed into that "Borg", LOL!

"A New Way of Working" isn't needed... Fred Brooks in "The Mythical Man Month (2. ed)" already hit all these issues way back in the 60's building OS/360...

It's the kiddies that seem to think the wheel needs to be re-invented every 10 minutes... ADD at it's worst...

Guys like Gene Amdahl and Fred Brooks were actually engineers, and put this business on the map.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4tad+19Fce0Yw

Previn got us off of Sametime, notes, connections and the other c-ap. Sounds like all y'all are bûttsore because you aren't using IBM products. All you old timers are afraid of change.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4olp+19Fce0Yw

It was implied #4 was based on fear of arrogant and bullish upper mgmt. Goes with the prison compare as well. Sounds like you confirmed my #4 strongly

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wfm+19Fce0Yw

@1eie+19Fce0Yw

Your #4 is completely WRONG... The upper level is a mafia that do not want to hear anything that comes from the lower levels. They think they can edict orders and expect everybody to follow, they have interest in feedback.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bdn+19Fce0Yw

Previn was definitely a fix what is not broken or change for sake of change leader. IBM has a productivity problem but they keep making it worse by their own hand. Fletcher was pounding AGILE down IT throat as a one size fits all and there was some good to it but the methodology was extremely counter productive for many projects and teams... And created 2 problems for every one it solved. Combine that with relentless mandates to change app tooling two or three times in a year it made routine project work darn near impossible because people were never focused on what they do best. Instead they were focused on the latest corp mandate/direction change of the day instead of the real project work that needed to b done thus inflating the productivity issue.

IBMs Problems:

  1. Countless reorgs/RAs have left people orphaned or absorbed into positions with titles that can't be backed up with the modern skills or experience to match, and those people know how to play the Corp game well enough to stay low and quiet. So yes allot of dead weight especially in management. Lots of staff on paper but real work is being done by over burdened few that typically get burnt out and leave because the other resources have no idea of what they are doing but in pretending to they make projects 10x worse. But no one tells on them because IBM has earned it's heartless don't care about employees attitude fittingly so to their is nothing to gain by ratting on 60 yr old guy praying to make it to retirement before being found out or the 35 yr old software developer who has never coded but due to reorgs and consolidations they actually wind up these positions.
  1. Trying to find and manage #1 above leaders continuously imposes and mandate top down no exception initiatives, direction/tool/process changes that truly don't fit everwhere abd destroy the productivity and moral of the great resources and teams already performing very well by penalizing them for the sins of the #1.
  1. They are so busy trying to prison guard their mysterious productivity problem related to #1 that the good people they do have become prisoners too.
  1. Upper level execs have no idea about what is really happening on the ground because mid level and lower level mgmt are afraid to tell them anything other than what they want to hear. One can b on a mission critical project with a challenging deadline.... Then a mandate comes down like "everyone must immediately do AGILE" or "all projects must use only cloud software and hardware".... These sound fine right? But no one helps upper mgmt feel the impact of their decisions.... Like hey plugging in AGILE to our in flight project is going to add a month... Or some software in the cloud is buggy or features not available that are mission critical to the project.... That means the retooling to cloud and dealing w the glitches will add 3 months to a project ...... As soon as ground folks share the concerns they are met with "upper mgmt doesn't care and wants the projects delivered on the orig time frame regardless of the new issues". Multiply this x 10000
  1. Because of #4 leaders never truly understand the side effects of their decisions.... Imagine a 10 person team charged with making sure a particular internal business services is running, well maintained, documented and increasingly providing value to the customer ... Then 3 yrs later an RA hits and the team loses 4 people.... A yr later 2 more people.... So team is down to 4 but as time goes by new management of the team forgets the original team had 10 people, but starts to get complaints from other depts because the service isn't reliable any more, or issues not getting resolved fast enough... And instead of communicating the real issue up the chain the now 4 person team is disciplined or scolded because they are no longer providing the same quality as 10 people did ..... This problem is huge ...
  1. IBM is just too big.... It's too hard to govern in just one way... A single decision could help 60% of the company but unintentionally wreak unrecoverable havoc on the other 40%. Combine this with I'll informed leaders making decisions/changes because that's what their paid to do results in frequent sledgehammer being used when a scalpel was the right tool.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1eie+19Fce0Yw

Duh Where else would Rosemary's Baby have been incubating

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1drc+19Fce0Yw

Never heard anyone say his name. Always just referred to as “the CIOs office”. Guess now I know why.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fyz+19Fce0Yw

I bet all these commenters were saying "but muh sametime" last year...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ney+19Fce0Yw

Anyone know him? I see he is Mia Farrows son

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bso+19Fce0Yw

I can't find sh– at IBM in regards to content or people. Fletcher basically took all the tools that start-ups use that aren't enterprise ready and forced IBM to use it. We use BOX and can't even SEARCH CONTENT because of the security concerns due to IBM's policies. We could search for file previous to this within IBM.
People ... we used to have a collaboration tool built around people. Then there was a cloud version which IBM was suppose to use. No direction from CIO so we have 2 environments that did the same. Solution? Sunset both and go eat a d!(*.
This guy has thrown around popular tools without baking it into a process to actually help people get their jobs done. CRM system is a complete sh– show. And funny part - IBM claims to be a data and analytics company, but we don't seem to leverage it to benefit our own business. CIO did not empower the people of IBM.
He can go pound sand.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gxa+19Fce0Yw

He has helped destroy IBM via the CIO's office. I hope the new CIO undoes the damage he did. Since he joined it is almost impossible to find content, people and knowledge inside IBM. Three key things to be a successful company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tpf+19Fce0Yw

I just can't recall any IBM CIOs doing anything of value...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qov+19Fce0Yw

Zzzzzzz another lifer. Nothing new to see here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ruv+19Fce0Yw

Another IBM lifer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ady+19Fce0Yw

Post a reply

: