Having worked at Paulsboro and Clinton (moved through the NJRSC), I know that the Paulsboro folks were very unhappy. Yes, some took relocation assistance and felt financially better off, but they were unhappy about moving from the Philadelphia area to the middle of nowhere. The wise ones didn't relocate and had a 90 minute/65 mile commute each way, but they will be glad of this in the end. With employment opportunities shrinking, who the heck would buy your house if it was in Allentown, Doylestown, Easton (God forbid!), or in one of the third rate shanty towns around Clinton in NJ? That will be a huge millstone around your neck.
The main reason for their unhappiness though, was that the NJRSC activity just didn't make sense from an economic or technical perspective. Paulsboro was a low cost operation site compared to Clinton, and there were empty buildings available for use as offices and labs.
We were told fairytales of creating a "world-class R&D facility"; that the infrastructure at Clinton (where ceiling plaster was falling down in the food court area, the rotating doors at the north entrance were out of action half the time, where the heating didn't work properly and the first floor corridors of the Lab Building were freezing during winter) was more robust that at Paulsboro; and that everyone would benefit from limitless "collaboration and synergy" between CSR and Paulsboro staff.
In reality, the reason for NJRSC was to use Paulsboro's project money (intended for Product Development) to subsidize the exponentially increasing overhead costs at Clinton. Much of the test equipment from Paulsboro had to be left behind, as the "donated" lab space from CSR was too small to fit everything. Combined with the fact that the heritage CSR Analytical Section didn't want to support the test needs of the h-Paulsboro groups, this meant that more and more test work had to be sent offsite (increasing external costs). But hold on - the budget for external costs had to be reduced, because the overhead reductions (staff hourly rates and internal testing rates) got bigger, to subsidize CSR. So all of the Product Development work from Paulsboro had to slow down or be pushed back on project timelines. In a way, the effects of the pandemic helped here (reduced product demand led to delayed rollout of new formulations), but that's going to impact on future needs and timing for any new products.
As for "collaboration and synergy", well - it's extremely rare to see anyone who is heritage Clinton talk to anyone who is heritage Paulsboro, unless they are forced to through project work. The h-Clinton (CSR) folk definitely regard the h-Paulsboro staff as second class citizens. From the alternate perspective, the h-Paulsboro technical staff know that CSR has survived on smoke and mirrors for the last 25-30 years. The only valuable output from CSR in that time has been a couple of catalyst developments (e.g. supporting Rotterdam and Singapore Group II production).
The rest of the "big ticket" items (such as Algae and Carbon Capture) are just money pits for their PR value. Everyone knows that the main work is conducted by third party companies and universities and that CSR doesn't have the necessary in-house expertise. But Dr Syrup continues to spin the story for an uninterested Board and for general media purposes, while those on the inside (who are force-fed the same stories) know the truth.