I found this article from some recruiter on LinkedIn. It says a lot that it's more informative than anything I've seen from T. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/att-cuts-retiree-healthcare-employee-benefits-nancy-johnson-bsn-phn/
12 replies (most recent on top)
I agree that people trolling through this site, attempting to bolster their businesses by capitalizing on others' misfortune, is appalling. All done under the guise of "helping" by piecing together information in a "newsletter" and spamming social sites with it.
They're no better than multi-level marketing firms looking for laid-off workers to convince them to "be their own boss."
The amount of trolls on this site is made apparent on this thread, quite appalling
This stuff is all over my LinkedIn and FB feeds. They piece together information from places like this and then release a "newsletter", inviting you to an online seminar or something, citing the recent benefit changes. The information is usually dated and incorrect. The fact that they fool active employees and retirees into thinking they are somehow connected to, or in tune with AT&T Benefits is amusing.
@1gyo - agreed - she is constantly trying to connect with T employees on LinkedIn trying to sell her services.
It's like "The Retirement Group" which tries to get departing employees to send them coworkers' webphone information so they can cold call.
I have no idea of she's here posting links to her own articles (nobody knows for sure) but it sure fits her pattern of behavior.
No. I did not post the article on LinkedIn. I am sickened that anyone would call another human being ‘garbage’ or ‘utter filth’ simply because she posted an article. No one, not even YOU should be addressed in this fashion. I do hope the author sees this post and responds. Like I said, your comments are indefensible and repugnant.
The OP is obviously the author of the "article" on LinkedIn, promoting it. She has been here multiple times, playing the "innocent lamb" trying to "help" us.
Nobody would have an issue with the author of the article if she didn't repeatedly come here trying to spam her work pretending to be a neutral third party.
The words of the poster: ‘that piece of garbage’ and ‘utter filth’ are quoted, aimed at the individual. Again, do you know the person who posted an article on LinkedIn? Those comments are despicable.
Spammers are filth.
‘Subhuman filth’ is what YOU call someone who posts an article on LinkedIn that you didn’t like? Do you know this woman?
What (not who) are you to post such a comment?
Realizing you and your comrades give your own comments up arrows and down arrows to all others is telling.
Your comments are atrocious and indefensible. What ARE you?
That piece of garbage actively tries to connect with everyone at AT&T through Linkedin in order to spam them. Utter subhuman filth.
Not new information for the employees who received this information in email messages. It may be new to those who didn't get the "targeted" messages.
OP is a recruiter attempting to draw attention to herself. Zero new information.