Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

How to improve things at the IC level

If they want to improve things at the IC level, here are some ideas:

  • Cap manager raises at 1% annually for 3 years
  • Implement a 3 year ban on promotions for anyone in management. They need to focus on doing their current job better
  • Funnel the savings into raises and (backlogged) promos for ICs
  • Solicit feedback from all current and past employees on all current managers with an eye toward identifying toxic managers. Include within the review scope managers who periodically are reverted to a temporary IC role because they repeatedly show they are lousy managers
  • When sufficient evidence is amassed from the feedback (+ records already in HR) that points to a manager having a pattern of toxicity, terminate them.
  • Get rid of the BE/IR quota. Learn to figure out which ICs truly need to get axed. If a group has no slackers, keep everyone. If 20% are hopeless slackers, get rid of the 20%.
  • If good workers are inhabiting unimportant roles, work with them to get them into important roles. Don’t punish them for doing a good job in a role that was sanctioned and approved by Intel, but is now of a lower importance (unbeknownst to them)

Taken from @dfye+19jUUDEf, bumped into a thread so more people could see it.

by
| 2493 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+19zPoKuu

6 replies (most recent on top)

Just look for a better job, man.

That’s something you can control rather than throwing suggestions into the void.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4ofr+19zPoKuu

Better yet, let the manager's direct reports determine the manager performance review.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2acz+19zPoKuu

Problem is they will fail to distinguish the bad managers from the good. And given their EB multipliers and bonuses, the bad ones won’t leave. And given Intel’s rep, the good ones won’t join!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2tng+19zPoKuu

I recommend the more modest goal of firing sh–ty managers and rewarding good ones. A manager who isn’t worth 1%/yr pay increases isn’t worth employing at all.

Capping manager pay and promotions guarantees that Intel will attract no decent managers, and lose the few that exist.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ktd+19zPoKuu

The Intel pension plan was frozen; reinstating it and reinstating SERMA is a good idea, with contributions for years in which Intel is profitable, to answer the argument that it can't be continued

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mho+19zPoKuu

Even easier: Get a job with a company that doesn’t s—, pays more, and gives you a little respect.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yeu+19zPoKuu

Post a reply

: