Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Exxon under pressure as ISS backs Engine No. 1 nominees in board fight

Exxon under pressure as ISS backs Engine No. 1 nominees in board fight
Source: Reuters
Author: Svea Herbst-bayliss
14 May 2021

Influential proxy advisor Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) on Friday threw its weight behind a small hedge fund's nominations for Exxon Mobil's board in a decision that could affect the outcome of a bitter corporate battle.

Activist fund Engine No.1 has taken aim at Exxon's board and decision making in the first major shareholder contest to make climate change the leading issue for choosing directors. The fund has criticized Exxon for a lagging approach to lower-carbon energy and poor returns on past fossil fuel investments.

The ISS recommendation in favor of three of the four directors put forward by Engine No.1 is the second from a proxy adviser. Pensions & Investment Research Consultants (PIRC) published its view on Wednesday, backing all four Engine No.1 candidates. read more

ISS recommended that shareholders vote for former oil industry executives Gregory Goff and Kaisa Hietala and for former U.S. government energy official Alexander Karsner. The three “address the need for independent industry expertise … (and) “elevate the board’s ability to assess the energy transition,” ISS said.

Exxon Chief Executive Darren Woods said he disagreed with the recommendations and believes the activist puts "the company's future and the dividend in jeopardy."

"We feel very strongly that the board will drive success in today's environment and position the company for success as the industry transitions," Woods said.

The ISS and PIRC recommendations carry weight among institutional investors and often guide how they vote at corporate meetings. Exxon's shareholders will vote on May 26.

Exxon's stock price climbed 2% in trading on Friday and has risen over 40% since the start of 2021. Engine No.1 can credibly claim a portion of the credit for that, ISS said in its report.

"ISS’ recommendation is further validation of our belief that addressing the fundamental issues at Exxon Mobil requires a Board that includes individuals with relevant energy industry experience and skills," Engine No. 1 said in a statement.

Exxon and Engine No.1 are spending at least $65 million in the fight for Exxon's future direction. The $250 million California-based hedge fund has called for spending and pay cuts, a board shake-up and shift to cleaner fuels that it describes as "existential" for the oil giant. read more

Its views are supported by New York and California pension funds and British investor Legal & General Investment Management, all of which hold Exxon shares.

Exxon has fought to reelect its board arguing they have developed a strong plan to address future lower carbon demands, including a proposal for a massive carbon capture and sequestration project.

ISS's report said it is “unclear how committed” Exxon is to its energy transition strategy. Its proposal “appears to be based in significant part on future government support.”

Exxon, valued at $264 billion, has fended off past challenges seeking big change to its policies and leadership. As pressure from shareholders mounted this year, Exxon made a number of changes, including adding activist investor Jeffrey Ubben, former Comcast Corp executive Michael Angelakis and former Petronas CEO Tan Sri Wan Zulkiflee Wan Ariffin to the board.

by
| 2146 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1aSDcaiA

10 replies (most recent on top)

If it doesn’t pass the stock will tank!

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/investors-increase-exxon-holdings-activists-pressure-push-shares-higher-2021-05-17/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ikl+1aSDcaiA

How do you vote white card? I haven’t seen one yet in the mail.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hvr+1aSDcaiA

I voted straight blue card and won’t give into activists.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eqz+1aSDcaiA

One of the points here - the May 26 outcome will be important.
If DW remains CEO/Chairman for example, the dividend will stay high.
Actually it will increase significantly - with the stock at 30 USD, it'll be like a 20% dividend!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xqr+1aSDcaiA

Many post here are sentiments of current employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tza+1aSDcaiA

@ftj+1aSDcaiA

You are NSI if you can't tell it's the employees at campus and sites who come here to vent. You are in your own little bubble of you believe the company is OK and in good shape.

Source: current employee who talks with other coworkers. Majority who have the same sentiment as many disgruntled people in this forum.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tkp+1aSDcaiA

No they are worthless employees fired or councelled because they are mo--ns or not as effective contributors than they think they are.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ftj+1aSDcaiA

This is pure green propaganda FYI. ISS is a climate activist group. So is the other proxy group that put out their press release this week. This is like a fat kid supporting cake. Why do these groups feel the need to manipulate people like this?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @skt+1aSDcaiA

My guess is internal people. Most employees hate the management, culture and fake meritocracy (I.e. a-s-kissing). But they stick around for the paycheck. In most cases, employees have spent over 15 years at XOM and wouldn’t know how to find a job outside. Additionally, the skills (specially as supervisors/managers) are not marketable outside XOM. So they come vent here. A lot of the criticism towards XOM is well deserved.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yad+1aSDcaiA

I have to ask this question because I see a lot of posters dumping on EM. Who does the posting? Are the internal ppl that disenfranchised or there are external forces vomiting all over this? Just curious....not an EM employee.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jbg+1aSDcaiA

Post a reply

: