Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

Biden’s infrastructure plan could push more cities to offer internet service directly

Under the surface of Washington’s negotiations over infrastructure – and buried in jargon like "municipal networks" and "overbuilding" – is a debate about how Americans may get their internet in the years ahead.

Will your broadband bill come from a purely private company or will it be more like a public utility?

The Biden administration wants to at least nudge the country toward the latter.

The effort is being led by Vice President Kamala Harris and one aspect of the administration's plan would encourage government-owned broadband networks. In other words, they want to prod more cities to set up shop and offer service directly.

As of January, there are more than 560 communities served by some form of a municipal network with many operating alongside private service providers.

A fact sheet released by the White House in March suggests that number could rise with passage of the American Jobs Act. The plan “prioritizes support for broadband networks owned, operated by, or affiliated with local governments, non-profits, and co-operatives,” and would move toward “lifting barriers that prevent municipally-owned or affiliated providers and rural electric co-ops from competing on an even playing field with private providers.”

“I'm very proud to lead our administration's effort to get this done,” Harris said at an event Monday at the White House, of the overall plan.

by
| 1251 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1b2ZLTv7

5 replies (most recent on top)

Yay socialism. Let's depend on the government for everything. What could go wrong?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5euw+1b2ZLTv7

Big tech might be able to do all that now (or will be able to in the future), and by writing it into the terms and condtions, you will give them the right to. At least we can fall back on the constitution... FWIW... to protect or rights and privacy. At least theoretically, we'll be better protected.
I think the better solution is to reform section 230... redefining the internet and social media platform as common carriers, and making editorial actions illegal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wfa+1b2ZLTv7

Then the government won't need a warrant to get search history if they run the network or control what we can and cannot access (sound like China?). So if they control the internet access, I guess the next thing is for them to figure out a way to get their hands into the DNA databases at will. Why stop there...they can just imprint a QR code on our shoulders at birth (remember the old vaccinations we used to get on our shoulders back in the day), and they can keep tabs on us completely.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cut+1b2ZLTv7

Well, if you wait for Verizon, AT&T, and the rest of these clowns to build it. It will never arrive. Fifteen years down the road and we still haven’t finished the Fios build, or started 5G. And that’s after paying fees for years to
“ upgrade the network”. It’s time for PSC to do something about that.......good luck with that

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @has+1b2ZLTv7

Good!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ocb+1b2ZLTv7

Post a reply

: